BACKGROUND: Because Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), the etiologic agent of Johne's disease in ruminant, has been identified in the mucosal layer and deeper bowel wall in CD patients, the seroactivity against MAP may define a distinct subset of patients requiring individual treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of anti-MAP antibodies in the diagnostic strategy for CD. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-two individuals were included: 81 with CD, 36 with ulcerative colitis, 35 with coeliac diseases and 120 healthy blood donors. Anti-MAP were detected by ELISA using a purified protein derivative from MAP. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of anti-MAP and ASCA for CD diagnosis were similar (sensitivity: 0.33 ± 0.10 and 0.31 ± 0.10; specificity: 0.96 ± 0.03 and 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively). A combination of these two tests enabled an increase in sensitivity (0.53 ± 0.10), although specificity remained unchanged (0.95 ± 0.04). No correlation was found between anti-MAP positivity and clinical features such as age at onset and the duration of CD, disease location, or intestinal complications. Conversely, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD were statistically associated with a positivity of anti-MAP (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.028), mostly with respect to arthritis (44.5% vs. 13%, P < 0.002). Interestingly, anti-MAP and ASCA were also found in an active form of coeliac disease. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a complementary role of ASCA and anti-MAP for CD diagnosis and a possible common role of bacteria in small intestinal mucosal damage in CD and coeliac disease.
BACKGROUND: Because Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), the etiologic agent of Johne's disease in ruminant, has been identified in the mucosal layer and deeper bowel wall in CDpatients, the seroactivity against MAP may define a distinct subset of patients requiring individual treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of anti-MAP antibodies in the diagnostic strategy for CD. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-two individuals were included: 81 with CD, 36 with ulcerative colitis, 35 with coeliac diseases and 120 healthy blood donors. Anti-MAP were detected by ELISA using a purified protein derivative from MAP. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of anti-MAP and ASCA for CD diagnosis were similar (sensitivity: 0.33 ± 0.10 and 0.31 ± 0.10; specificity: 0.96 ± 0.03 and 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively). A combination of these two tests enabled an increase in sensitivity (0.53 ± 0.10), although specificity remained unchanged (0.95 ± 0.04). No correlation was found between anti-MAP positivity and clinical features such as age at onset and the duration of CD, disease location, or intestinal complications. Conversely, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD were statistically associated with a positivity of anti-MAP (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.028), mostly with respect to arthritis (44.5% vs. 13%, P < 0.002). Interestingly, anti-MAP and ASCA were also found in an active form of coeliac disease. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a complementary role of ASCA and anti-MAP for CD diagnosis and a possible common role of bacteria in small intestinal mucosal damage in CD and coeliac disease.
Authors: Adria A Condino; Edward J Hoffenberg; Frank Accurso; Chureeporn Penvari; Meg Anthony; Jane Gralla; Judith A O'Connor Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Marla C Dubinsky; Ying-Chao Lin; Debra Dutridge; Yoana Picornell; Carol J Landers; Sharmayne Farrior; Iwona Wrobel; Antonio Quiros; Eric A Vasiliauskas; Bruce Grill; David Israel; Ron Bahar; Dennis Christie; Ghassan Wahbeh; Gary Silber; Saied Dallazadeh; Praful Shah; Danny Thomas; Drew Kelts; Robert M Hershberg; Charles O Elson; Stephan R Targan; Kent D Taylor; Jerome I Rotter; Huiying Yang Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ira Shafran; Christopher Piromalli; Jonathan W Decker; Javier Sandoval; Saleh A Naser; Fouad A K El-Zaatari Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: S Desplat-Jégo; C Johanet; A Escande; J Goetz; N Fabien; N Olsson; E Ballot; J Sarles; J J Baudon; J C Grimaud; M Veyrac; P Chamouard; R L Humbel Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-04-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Mohamed Salem; Carsten Heydel; Amr El-Sayed; Samia A Ahmed; Michael Zschöck; George Baljer Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Date: 2012-09-30 Impact factor: 1.559
Authors: Liisa Viitasalo; Laura Niemi; Merja Ashorn; Sara Ashorn; Jonathan Braun; Heini Huhtala; Pekka Collin; Markku Mäki; Katri Kaukinen; Kalle Kurppa; Sari Iltanen Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.062