PURPOSE: Hitherto, studies on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation have shown partly inconsistent results. Our study investigated the clinical course and course of immune status after HAART initiation at CD4-cell-count/μl of treated patients between 250 and 349 (group 1), compared to 350-449 (group 2), on the basis of the cohort of the Competence Network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet cohort). METHODS: Patients had to be HAART-naïve. Medication had to start at the earliest in 1996, being at least triple combination therapy. The primary endpoints of death, first AIDS-defining illness and first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 were evaluated as censored event times between the initiation of HAART (t (0)) and the date of the first event/date of last observation. Probabilities of event-free intervals since t (0) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by logrank tests. The results were adjusted for confounders using Cox regression. Additionally, incidences were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 822 patients met the inclusion criteria (group 1: 526, group 2: 296), covering 4,133 patient years (py) overall. In group 1, 0.64 death cases/100 py were found, with the corresponding vale being 0.17 in group 2. In group 1, 1.38 AIDS-defining events/100 py occurred, whereas it was 0.78 in group 2. In group 1, 2.64 events of first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 occurred per 100 py, compared to 0.77 in group 2. Kaplan-Meier estimations showed borderline significant differences regarding death (p = 0.063), no differences regarding first AIDS-defining illness (p = 0.148) and distinct differences regarding the first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The results gave a strong hint for a therapy initiation at higher CD4-cell-count/μl regarding the outcome of death in treated patients. A distinct benefit was shown regarding the first decline of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200.
PURPOSE: Hitherto, studies on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation have shown partly inconsistent results. Our study investigated the clinical course and course of immune status after HAART initiation at CD4-cell-count/μl of treated patients between 250 and 349 (group 1), compared to 350-449 (group 2), on the basis of the cohort of the Competence Network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet cohort). METHODS:Patients had to be HAART-naïve. Medication had to start at the earliest in 1996, being at least triple combination therapy. The primary endpoints of death, first AIDS-defining illness and first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 were evaluated as censored event times between the initiation of HAART (t (0)) and the date of the first event/date of last observation. Probabilities of event-free intervals since t (0) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by logrank tests. The results were adjusted for confounders using Cox regression. Additionally, incidences were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 822 patients met the inclusion criteria (group 1: 526, group 2: 296), covering 4,133 patient years (py) overall. In group 1, 0.64 death cases/100 py were found, with the corresponding vale being 0.17 in group 2. In group 1, 1.38 AIDS-defining events/100 py occurred, whereas it was 0.78 in group 2. In group 1, 2.64 events of first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 occurred per 100 py, compared to 0.77 in group 2. Kaplan-Meier estimations showed borderline significant differences regarding death (p = 0.063), no differences regarding first AIDS-defining illness (p = 0.148) and distinct differences regarding the first drop of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200 (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The results gave a strong hint for a therapy initiation at higher CD4-cell-count/μl regarding the outcome of death in treated patients. A distinct benefit was shown regarding the first decline of CD4-cell-count/μl below 200.
Authors: F Bonnet; R Thiébaut; G Chêne; D Neau; J-L Pellegrin; P Mercié; J Beylot; F Dabis; R Salamon; P Morlat Journal: HIV Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Melanie A Thompson; Judith A Aberg; Pedro Cahn; Julio S G Montaner; Giuliano Rizzardini; Amalio Telenti; José M Gatell; Huldrych F Günthard; Scott M Hammer; Martin S Hirsch; Donna M Jacobsen; Peter Reiss; Douglas D Richman; Paul A Volberding; Patrick Yeni; Robert T Schooley Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linda Ahdieh-Grant; Traci E Yamashita; John P Phair; Roger Detels; Steven M Wolinsky; Joseph B Margolick; Charles R Rinaldo; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Margaret T May; Jonathan A C Sterne; Dominique Costagliola; Caroline A Sabin; Andrew N Phillips; Amy C Justice; François Dabis; John Gill; Jens Lundgren; Robert S Hogg; Frank de Wolf; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Schlomo Staszewski; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Matthias Egger Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-08-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: K Jansen; C Michalik; M Hahn; S Dupke; S Esser; H Jaeger; S Köppe; A Moll; A Plettenberg; R E Schmidt; A Skaletz-Rorowski; N H Brockmeyer Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Andrew Zolopa; Janet Andersen; William Powderly; Alejandro Sanchez; Ian Sanne; Carol Suckow; Evelyn Hogg; Lauren Komarow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: G Madeddu; A G Fois; G M Calia; S Babudieri; V Soddu; F Becciu; M L Fiori; V Spada; C Lovigu; M Mannazzu; A Caddeo; B Piras; P Pirina; M S Mura Journal: Infection Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 3.553