Literature DB >> 21221684

What are we doing about septic arthritis? A survey of UK-based rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons.

Usman Butt1, Maame Amissah-Arthur, Fazal Khattak, Chris F Elsworth.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine the current practices and beliefs of United Kingdom (UK)-based rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons (OS) in managing septic arthritis (SA) and to determine awareness levels of national guidance. Two-hundred OS and 200 rheumatologists were sent a link to a web-based survey tool via email. Questions posed related to the management of SA, including the respondent's views on antibiotic therapy, joint drainage, which specialty should manage these cases, and also the clinician's evidence base. There were 354 functioning addresses with 182 responses (51%). One hundred fifty-one (77 OS, 74 rheumatologists) (43%) responses were complete and included for analysis. Eighty percent of rheumatologists and 82% of OS recommended 6-weeks total antibiotic therapy. Seventy-three percent in each group recommended 1-2 weeks intravenous therapy initially followed by oral continuation therapy. In patients at risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 25% rheumatologists and 14% OS would ensure MRSA cover. Seventy-seven percent of rheumatologists and 66% of OS recommended surgical joint drainage; 22% and 27%, respectively, recommended repeated closed needle aspiration as their chosen method of joint drainage. Sixty-six percent of rheumatologists and 65% of OS believed OS should manage SA. Twenty-three percent of rheumatologists and 22% of OS quoted published guidance as their main evidence base in the treatment of SA. Only 24% of rheumatologists and 34% of OS quoted British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) guidance when asked if they were aware of any guidelines. Views of rheumatologists and OS are not that dissimilar in managing SA. Surprisingly, rheumatologists are more aggressive regarding the recommendation for surgical joint drainage. Within both groups, significant variation in management principles exists often discrepant to recommendations laid out by the BSR. There are poor awareness levels of the BSR guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21221684     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-010-1672-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  12 in total

1.  A prospective 2-year study of 75 patients with adult-onset septic arthritis.

Authors:  M N Gupta; R D Sturrock; M Field
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  BSR & BHPR, BOA, RCGP and BSAC guidelines for management of the hot swollen joint in adults.

Authors:  G Coakley; C Mathews; M Field; A Jones; G Kingsley; D Walker; M Phillips; C Bradish; A McLachlan; R Mohammed; V Weston
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Medical vs surgical treatment for the native joint in septic arthritis: a 6-year, single UK academic centre experience.

Authors:  Vinod Ravindran; Ian Logan; Brian E Bourke
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  Bacterial septic arthritis in adults.

Authors:  Catherine J Mathews; Vivienne C Weston; Adrian Jones; Max Field; Gerald Coakley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Bacterial arthritis in an English health district: a 10 year review.

Authors:  C Cooper; M I Cawley
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982-1991.

Authors:  V C Weston; A C Jones; N Bradbury; F Fawthrop; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  How common is MRSA in adult septic arthritis?

Authors:  Bradley W Frazee; Christopher Fee; Larry Lambert
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Treatment of septic arthritis: comparison of needle aspiration and surgery as initial modes of joint drainage.

Authors:  D L Goldenberg; K D Brandt; A S Cohen; E S Cathcart
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb

9.  Septic arthritis: clinical audits would help optimise the management.

Authors:  V Ravindran; I Logan; B E Bourke
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Comparison of arthroscopic and open treatment of septic arthritis of the wrist.

Authors:  Douglas M Sammer; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of septic arthritis.

Authors:  Katie A Sharff; Eric P Richards; John M Townes
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic knee arthritis.

Authors:  Daniel J Johnson; Bennet A Butler; Matthew J Hartwell; Claire E Fernandez; Richard W Nicolay; Ryan S Selley; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-27

3.  Current surgical practice for septic arthritis of the knee in the United States.

Authors:  David Jaffe; Timothy Costales; Julio J Jauregui; Scott Koenig; Tristan B Weir; Patrick Greenwell; Matthew Christian; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 4.  Streptococcus gordonii septic arthritis: two cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Jean cyr Yombi; Leila Belkhir; Sylvie Jonckheere; Dunja Wilmes; Olivier Cornu; Bernard Vandercam; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Establishing Sustainable Arthroscopy Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) through High-Income Country/LMIC Partnerships: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Ericka P von Kaeppler; Nathan Coss; Claire A Donnelley; Dave M Atkin; Marc Tompkins; Billy Haonga; Alberto M V Molano; Saam Morshed; David W Shearer
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.