Literature DB >> 21220480

Gefitinib or placebo in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II study.

C Kent Osborne1, Patrick Neven, Luc Y Dirix, John R Mackey, Jean Robert, Craig Underhill, Rachel Schiff, Carolina Gutierrez, Ilenia Migliaccio, Valsamo K Anagnostou, David L Rimm, Patrick Magill, Mark Sellers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increased growth factor signaling may contribute to tamoxifen resistance. This randomized phase II trial assessed tamoxifen plus placebo or the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with newly metastatic disease or recurred after adjuvant tamoxifen (stratum 1), or recurred during/after adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) or after failed first-line AI (stratum 2), were eligible. Primary variables were progression-free survival (PFS; stratum 1) and clinical benefit rate (CBR; stratum 2). A 5% or more improvement in response variables with gefitinib was considered to warrant further investigation. Outcome was correlated with biomarkers measured on the primary tumor.
RESULTS: In stratum 1 (n = 206), the PFS HR (gefitinib:placebo) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.59-1.18; median PFS 10.9 versus 8.8 months). In the stratum 1 endocrine therapy-naïve subset (n = 158) the HR was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.52-1.15), and the prior endocrine-treated subgroup (n = 48) 1.47 (95% CI, 0.63-3.45). In stratum 1, CBRs were 50.5% with gefitinib and 45.5% with placebo. In stratum 2 (n = 84), CBRs were 29.2% with gefitinib and 31.4% with placebo. Biomarker analysis suggested that in stratum 1 there was greater benefit with gefitinib in patients who were ER-negative or had lower levels of ER protein.
CONCLUSIONS: In stratum 1, the improved PFS with gefitinib plus tamoxifen met the protocol criteria to warrant further investigation of this strategy. In stratum 2, there was a numerical disadvantage for gefitinib; additional investigation after AI therapy is not warranted. Studies of predictive biomarkers are needed to subset appropriate patients. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21220480      PMCID: PMC3074404          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  31 in total

1.  Phase II, randomized trial to compare anastrozole combined with gefitinib or placebo in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; Vicente Valero; Aroop Mangalik; Melanie Royce; Ian Rabinowitz; Francis P Arena; Joan F Kroener; Elizabeth Curcio; Claire Watkins; Sarah Bacus; Elsa M Cora; Elizabeth Anderson; Patrick J Magill
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy in hormone receptor positive advanced breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J Bonneterre; A Buzdar; J M Nabholtz; J F Robertson; B Thürlimann; M von Euler; T Sahmoud; A Webster; M Steinberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Gina G Chung; David L Rimm
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Elevated levels of epidermal growth factor receptor/c-erbB2 heterodimers mediate an autocrine growth regulatory pathway in tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 cells.

Authors:  Janice M Knowlden; Iain R Hutcheson; Helen E Jones; Tracieann Madden; Julia M W Gee; Maureen E Harper; Denise Barrow; Alan E Wakeling; Robert I Nicholson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.736

5.  HER-2/neu and p53 expression versus tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Berry; H B Muss; A D Thor; L Dressler; E T Liu; G Broadwater; D R Budman; I C Henderson; M Barcos; D Hayes; L Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  HER-2 amplification, HER-1 expression, and tamoxifen response in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study.

Authors:  Grazia Arpino; Stephanie J Green; D Craig Allred; Dannika Lew; Silvana Martino; C Kent Osborne; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses.

Authors:  Songdong Meng; Debasish Tripathy; Sanjay Shete; Raheela Ashfaq; Barbara Haley; Steve Perkins; Peter Beitsch; Amanullah Khan; David Euhus; Cynthia Osborne; Eugene Frenkel; Susan Hoover; Marilyn Leitch; Edward Clifford; Ellen Vitetta; Larry Morrison; Dorothee Herlyn; Leon W M M Terstappen; Timothy Fleming; Tanja Fehm; Thomas Tucker; Nancy Lane; Jianqiang Wang; Jonathan Uhr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: increased estrogen receptor-HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiang Shou; Suleiman Massarweh; C Kent Osborne; Alan E Wakeling; Simale Ali; Heidi Weiss; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The antiepidermal growth factor receptor agent gefitinib (ZD1839/Iressa) improves antihormone response and prevents development of resistance in breast cancer in vitro.

Authors:  J M W Gee; M E Harper; I R Hutcheson; T A Madden; D Barrow; J M Knowlden; R A McClelland; N Jordan; A E Wakeling; R I Nicholson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  Multiple estrogen receptor assays in human breast cancer.

Authors:  D F Hull; G M Clark; C K Osborne; G C Chamness; W A Knight; W L McGuire
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  72 in total

1.  Optimal structural inference of signaling pathways from unordered and overlapping gene sets.

Authors:  Lipi R Acharya; Thair Judeh; Guangdi Wang; Dongxiao Zhu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Mechanisms of resistance to hormonal treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Eroles; A Bosch; B Bermejo; A Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Upregulation of mucin4 in ER-positive/HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts with acquired resistance to endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Albert C Chen; Ilenia Migliaccio; Mothaffar Rimawi; Sara Lopez-Tarruella; Chad J Creighton; Suleiman Massarweh; Catherine Huang; Yen-Chao Wang; Surinder K Batra; M Carolina Gutierrez; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Metastatic breast cancer: The Odyssey of personalization.

Authors:  A Sonnenblick; N Pondé; M Piccart
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  A transformation in the mechanism by which the urokinase receptor signals provides a selection advantage for estrogen receptor-expressing breast cancer cells in the absence of estrogen.

Authors:  Boryana M Eastman; Minji Jo; Drue L Webb; Shinako Takimoto; Steven L Gonias
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 6.  Overcoming endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer: Current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea Milani; Elena Geuna; Gloria Mittica; Giorgio Valabrega
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

7.  Therapeutic potential of the dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AZD8931 in circumventing endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Gladys Morrison; Xiaoyong Fu; Martin Shea; Sarmistha Nanda; Mario Giuliano; Tao Wang; Teresa Klinowska; C Kent Osborne; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  HSP90 empowers evolution of resistance to hormonal therapy in human breast cancer models.

Authors:  Luke Whitesell; Sandro Santagata; Marc L Mendillo; Nancy U Lin; David A Proia; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer association with biologic phenotype and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mothaffar F Rimawi; Priya B Shetty; Heidi L Weiss; Rachel Schiff; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Grape polyphenols inhibit Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and potentiate the effects of gefitinib in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linette Castillo-Pichardo; Suranganie F Dharmawardhane
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.