INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnoses of the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) include all forms of intracranial stenotic disease, such as primary or secondary vasculitis of the central nervous system. Here, we tested the hypothesis that angiographic response to intra-arterial nimodipine application may be helpful in differentiating between RCVS and other entities. METHODS: A digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) series of nine consecutive patients with suspected RCVS that were treated by intra-arterial nimodipine due to clinical worsening were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and post-therapeutic DSA findings of patients with later-confirmed RCVS were compared to those in which another diagnosis was finally made. RESULTS: Intra-arterial nimodipine resulted in a normalization of both the diameter of the main trunks of the cerebral vessels and the caliber of the peripheral vessels in all RCVS patients. This was not the case in the non-RCVS patients, in whom only a slight general vasodilatation was observed. DISCUSSION: Our preliminary results indicate that angiographic response to intra-arterial application might be a helpful differential diagnostic tool in select patients with suspected RCVS.
INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnoses of the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) include all forms of intracranial stenotic disease, such as primary or secondary vasculitis of the central nervous system. Here, we tested the hypothesis that angiographic response to intra-arterial nimodipine application may be helpful in differentiating between RCVS and other entities. METHODS: A digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) series of nine consecutive patients with suspected RCVS that were treated by intra-arterial nimodipine due to clinical worsening were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and post-therapeutic DSA findings of patients with later-confirmed RCVS were compared to those in which another diagnosis was finally made. RESULTS: Intra-arterial nimodipine resulted in a normalization of both the diameter of the main trunks of the cerebral vessels and the caliber of the peripheral vessels in all RCVS patients. This was not the case in the non-RCVS patients, in whom only a slight general vasodilatation was observed. DISCUSSION: Our preliminary results indicate that angiographic response to intra-arterial application might be a helpful differential diagnostic tool in select patients with suspected RCVS.
Authors: J M Ospel; C H Wright; R Jung; L L M Vidal; S Manjila; G Singh; D V Heck; A Ray; K A Blackham Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Bersano; M Kraemer; A Burlina; M Mancuso; J Finsterer; S Sacco; C Salvarani; L Caputi; H Chabriat; S Lesnik Oberstein; A Federico; E Tournier Lasserve; D Hunt; M Dichgans; M Arnold; S Debette; H S Markus Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: J M Sequeiros; J A Roa; R P Sabotin; S Dandapat; S Ortega-Gutierrez; E C Leira; C P Derdeyn; G Bathla; D M Hasan; E A Samaniego Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: F Seker; J Hesser; M A Brockmann; E Neumaier-Probst; C Groden; R Schubert; C Brockmann Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 3.649