Literature DB >> 21220270

Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.

Victor Coba1, Melissa Whitmill2, Roberta Mooney3, H Mathilda Horst2, Mary-Margaret Brandt2, Bruno Digiovine4, Mark Mlynarek2, Beth McLellan5, Gail Boleski5, James Yang6, William Conway3, Jack Jordan3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: While clinicians' management of severe sepsis and septic shock has been positively influenced by a number of clinical research studies in the last decade, challenges remain regarding early hemodynamic optimization as envisioned in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's (SSC) resuscitation bundle (RB). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative on patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock, and the impact of the sepsis RB on patient outcomes when completed beyond the 6-hour recommendation period. The study was an 18-month, prospective cohort study enrolling patients who met the definition of severe sepsis or septic shock. Compliance with the hemodynamic components of the sepsis RB was defined as achieving goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mm Hg, central venous pressure (CVP) ≥ 8 mm Hg, and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) ≥ 70%. Compliance was assessed at 6 hours and 18 hours after diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. In all, 498 patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock were evaluated to determine the upper limit of the range of hours that compliance with the RB would still improve outcomes. Using 18 hours as a marker, Compliers at 18 hrs and Non-Compliers at 18 hrs were compared. There were 202 patients who had the RB completed in less than or equal to 18 hours. There were 296 patients who did not complete the RB at 18 hours. The Compliers at 18 hrs had a significant 10.2% lower hospital mortality 37.1% (22% relative reduction) compared to the Non-Compliers at 18 hrs hospital mortality of 47.3% (P < .03). When the two groups were adjusted for differences in baseline illness severity, the Compliers at 18 hrs had a greater reduction in predicted mortality of 26.8% versus 9.4%, P < 0.01.
CONCLUSIONS: Initiating the sepsis RB for patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock decreased mortality. A CQI initiative that monitored the implementation in real-time allowed for improvement in compliance and efficacy of the bundle on outcomes. Multiple studies have shown that compliance to the RB within 6 hours lowers hospital mortality. This study uniquely shows that when bundle completion is extended to 18 hours, the mortality reduction remains significant. © SAGE Publications 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bundles; infection; quality improvement; sepsis; septic shock; severe sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21220270     DOI: 10.1177/0885066610392499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  21 in total

Review 1.  Early management of sepsis with emphasis on early goal directed therapy: AME evidence series 002.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Yucai Hong; Nathan J Smischney; Han-Pin Kuo; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Win Sen Kuan; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Marc Leone; Herbert Spapen; David Grimaldi; Sven Van Poucke; Steven Q Simpson; Patrick M Honore; Stefan Hofer; Pietro Caironi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives.

Authors:  Faheem W Guirgis; Lisa Jones; Rhemar Esma; Alice Weiss; Kaitlin McCurdy; Jason Ferreira; Christina Cannon; Laura McLauchlin; Carmen Smotherman; Dale F Kraemer; Cynthia Gerdik; Kendall Webb; Jin Ra; Frederick A Moore; Kelly Gray-Eurom
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 3.  Implementing sepsis bundles.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-09

4.  Emergency Physician Compliance with Quality Indicators of Septic Shock and Severe Sepsis in Eastern Taiwanese Community Hospital.

Authors:  Chih-Chang Liu; Wan-Hua Annie Hsieh; Pei-Fang Lai; Sheng-Chuan Hu; Hui-Yi Huang; Zen Lang Bih
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Improving Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis.

Authors:  Scott B Armen; Carol V Freer; John W Showalter; Tonya Crook; Cynthia J Whitener; Cheri West; Thomas E Terndrup; Marissa Grifasi; Christopher J DeFlitch; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolving understanding.

Authors:  Kendra N Iskander; Marcin F Osuchowski; Deborah J Stearns-Kurosawa; Shinichiro Kurosawa; David Stepien; Catherine Valentine; Daniel G Remick
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Outcome of delayed resuscitation bundle achievement in emergency department patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Sohn; Seung Mok Ryoo; Dong Woo Seo; Jae Ho Lee; Bum Jin Oh; Kyoung Soo Lim; Jin Won Huh; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  The use of an early alert system to improve compliance with sepsis bundles and to assess impact on mortality.

Authors:  Jennifer Anne Larosa; Noeen Ahmad; Monica Feinberg; Monica Shah; Roseann Dibrienza; Sean Studer
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-26

9.  Outcome effectiveness of the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle with addition of lactate clearance as a bundle item: a multi-national evaluation.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Win Sen Kuan; Michael Batech; Pinak Shrikhande; Malcolm Mahadevan; Chih-Huang Li; Sumit Ray; Anna Dengel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The role of lactate clearance in the resuscitation bundle.

Authors:  Anthony M Napoli; Todd A Seigel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.