INTRODUCTION: Amino acids based tracers represent a promising class of tumor metabolic imaging agents with successful clinical applications. Two new phenylalanine derivatives, p-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-phenylalanine (FEP, [(18)F]2) and p-(3-[(18)F]fluoropropyl)-L-phenylalanine (FPP, [(18)F]3) were synthesized and evaluated in comparison to clinically utilized O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET, [(18)F]1). METHODS: FEP ([(18)F]2) and FPP ([(18)F]3) were successfully synthesized by a rapid and efficient two-step nucleophilic fluorination of tosylate precursors and deprotection reaction. In vitro cell uptake studies were carried out in 9L glioma cells. In vivo studies, 9L tumor xenografts were implanted in Fisher 344 rats. RESULTS: FEP ([(18)F]2) and FPP ([(18)F]3) could be efficiently labeled within 90 min with good enantiomeric purity (>95%), good yield (11-37%) and high specific activity (21-69 GBq/μmol). Cell uptake studies showed FEP had higher uptake than FPP as well as reference ligand FET ([(18)F]1). Uptake mechanism studies suggested that FEP is a selective substrate for system L and prefers its subtype LAT1. In vivo biodistribution studies demonstrated FEP had specific accumulation in tumor cells and tumor to background ratio reached 1.45 at 60 min. Small animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies showed FEP was comparable to FET for imaging rats bearing 9L tumor model. FEP had high uptake in 9L tumor compared to surrounding tissue and was quickly excreted through urinary tract. CONCLUSION: Biological evaluations indicate that FEP ([(18)F]2) is a potential useful tracer for tumor imaging with PET.
INTRODUCTION: Amino acids based tracers represent a promising class of tumor metabolic imaging agents with successful clinical applications. Two new phenylalanine derivatives, p-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-phenylalanine (FEP, [(18)F]2) and p-(3-[(18)F]fluoropropyl)-L-phenylalanine (FPP, [(18)F]3) were synthesized and evaluated in comparison to clinically utilized O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET, [(18)F]1). METHODS:FEP ([(18)F]2) and FPP ([(18)F]3) were successfully synthesized by a rapid and efficient two-step nucleophilic fluorination of tosylate precursors and deprotection reaction. In vitro cell uptake studies were carried out in 9L glioma cells. In vivo studies, 9L tumor xenografts were implanted in Fisher 344 rats. RESULTS:FEP ([(18)F]2) and FPP ([(18)F]3) could be efficiently labeled within 90 min with good enantiomeric purity (>95%), good yield (11-37%) and high specific activity (21-69 GBq/μmol). Cell uptake studies showed FEP had higher uptake than FPP as well as reference ligand FET ([(18)F]1). Uptake mechanism studies suggested that FEP is a selective substrate for system L and prefers its subtype LAT1. In vivo biodistribution studies demonstrated FEP had specific accumulation in tumor cells and tumor to background ratio reached 1.45 at 60 min. Small animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies showed FEP was comparable to FET for imaging rats bearing 9L tumor model. FEP had high uptake in 9L tumor compared to surrounding tissue and was quickly excreted through urinary tract. CONCLUSION: Biological evaluations indicate that FEP ([(18)F]2) is a potential useful tracer for tumor imaging with PET.
Authors: Dirk Hellwig; Ralf Ketter; Bernd F M Romeike; Nadja Sell; Andrea Schaefer; Jean R Moringlane; Carl-Martin Kirsch; Samuel Samnick Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-05-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: K Kaira; N Oriuchi; H Imai; K Shimizu; N Yanagitani; N Sunaga; T Hisada; S Tanaka; T Ishizuka; Y Kanai; H Endou; T Nakajima; M Mori Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jie Yan; Yang Yu; Jeon Woong Kang; Zhi Yang Tam; Shuoyu Xu; Eliza Li Shan Fong; Surya Pratap Singh; Ziwei Song; Lisa Tucker-Kellogg; Peter T C So; Hanry Yu Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Jeroen Verhoeven; Fabian Hulpia; Ken Kersemans; Julie Bolcaen; Stef De Lombaerde; Jan Goeman; Benedicte Descamps; Giorgio Hallaert; Caroline Van den Broecke; Karel Deblaere; Christian Vanhove; Johan Van der Eycken; Serge Van Calenbergh; Ingeborg Goethals; Filip De Vos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mette K Nedergaard; Karina Kristoffersen; Signe R Michaelsen; Jacob Madsen; Hans S Poulsen; Marie-Thérése Stockhausen; Ulrik Lassen; Andreas Kjaer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 3.240