Literature DB >> 21220061

Association between median family income and self-reported mood symptoms in bipolar disorder.

Michael Bauer1, Tasha Glenn, Natalie Rasgon, Wendy Marsh, Kemal Sagduyu, Rodrigo Munoz, Rita Schmid, Sara Haack, Peter C Whybrow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is broad consensus from epidemiologic research that lower socioeconomic status is related to poorer health. This study investigated the relation between median family income and self-reported mood symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder who reside in the United States.
METHODS: Two hundred eighty-four patients with bipolar disorder provided daily self-reported mood ratings for 6 months (50,054 days of data). Regardless of income, all patients were treated by a psychiatrist, took psychotropic medications, and participated in computerized self-monitoring throughout the study. Median family income was obtained from US census tract data. The association between income and mood was analyzed using income as both a continuous and categorical variable. Demographic characteristics were compared by income group. Education level was included in the analysis a priori.
RESULTS: Both the continuous and categorical approaches found a positive association between income and euthymia, a negative association between income and manic/hypomanic symptoms including those due to mixed states, and no association between income and depressive symptoms. Patients in the lower-income group spent 12.4% fewer days euthymic than those in the upper-income group and 9.7% fewer days euthymic than those in the middle-income group. Patients in the lower-income group spent 7.1% more days with manic/hypomanic symptoms than those in the upper-income group. There was no association between education and income.
CONCLUSION: Median family income is associated with mood symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder. Inclusion of income as a measure of socioeconomic status is recommended for future studies of outcome in bipolar disorder.
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21220061     DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  5 in total

1.  Family functioning deficits in bipolar disorder and ADHD in youth.

Authors:  Matthew E Young; Thania Galvan; Brooke L Reidy; Matthew F Pescosolido; Kerri L Kim; Karen Seymour; Daniel P Dickstein
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Bipolar disorder and socioeconomic status: what is the nature of this relationship?

Authors:  Laeticia Eid; Katrina Heim; Sarah Doucette; Shannon McCloskey; Anne Duffy; Paul Grof
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2013-06-21

3.  Hospital treatment, mortality and healthcare costs in relation to socioeconomic status among people with bipolar affective disorder.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Pan; Ling-Ling Yeh; Yu-Chun Chen; Kuei-Hong Kuo; Chin-Kuo Chang
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 4.  Systematic review of patients' participation in and experiences of technology-based monitoring of mental health symptoms in the community.

Authors:  Sophie Walsh; Eoin Golden; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Mental health problems and socioeconomic disadvantage: a controlled household study in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yohannes Hailemichael; Charlotte Hanlon; Kebede Tirfessa; Sumaiyah Docrat; Atalay Alem; Girmay Medhin; Abebaw Fekadu; Crick Lund; Dan Chisholm; Damen Hailemariam
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.