Literature DB >> 21219752

SaniTwice: a novel approach to hand hygiene for reducing bacterial contamination on hands when soap and water are unavailable.

Sarah L Edmonds1, James Mann, Robert R McCormack, David R Macinga, Christopher M Fricker, James W Arbogast, Michael J Dolan.   

Abstract

The risk of inadequate hand hygiene in food handling settings is exacerbated when water is limited or unavailable, thereby making washing with soap and water difficult. The SaniTwice method involves application of excess alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), hand "washing" for 15 s, and thorough cleaning with paper towels while hands are still wet, followed by a standard application of ABHS. This study investigated the effectiveness of the SaniTwice methodology as an alternative to hand washing for cleaning and removal of microorganisms. On hands moderately soiled with beef broth containing Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), washing with a nonantimicrobial hand washing product achieved a 2.86 (±0.64)-log reduction in microbial contamination compared with the baseline, whereas the SaniTwice method with 62 % ethanol (EtOH) gel, 62 % EtOH foam, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.64 ± 0.89, 3.64 ± 0.57, and 4.61 ± 0.33 log units, respectively. When hands were heavily soiled from handling raw hamburger containing E. coli, washing with nonantimicrobial hand washing product and antimicrobial hand washing product achieved reductions of 2.65 ± 0.33 and 2.69 ± 0.32 log units, respectively, whereas SaniTwice with 62 % EtOH foam, 70 % EtOH gel, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.87 ± 0.42, 2.99 ± 0.51, and 3.92 ± 0.65 log units, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the SaniTwice regimen with various ABHS is equivalent to or exceeds that of the standard hand washing approach as specified in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code. Implementation of the SaniTwice regimen in food handling settings with limited water availability should significantly reduce the risk of foodborne infections resulting from inadequate hand hygiene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21219752     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.12.2296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  4 in total

1.  Both Handwashing and an Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Intervention Reduce Soil and Microbial Contamination on Farmworker Hands during Harvest, but Produce Type Matters.

Authors:  Jessica L Prince-Guerra; Molly E Nace; Robert H Lyles; Anna M Fabiszewski de Aceituno; Faith E Bartz; James W Arbogast; Jennifer Gentry-Shields; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Norma Heredia; Santos García; Juan S Leon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Infection control for norovirus.

Authors:  L Barclay; G W Park; E Vega; A Hall; U Parashar; J Vinjé; B Lopman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Hand Hygiene: Knowledge and Attitudes of Fourth-Year Clerkship Medical Students at Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Reem Hamadah; Razan Kharraz; Airabab Alshanqity; Danah AlFawaz; Abdulaziz M Eshaq; Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-08-24

4.  Hand hygiene knowledge and attitude of medical students in western Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Marwan A Bakarman; Mukhtiar Baig; Ahmad A Malik; Zohair J Gazzaz; Mostafa M Mostafa; Mohamed A Zayed; Abdulaziz S Balubaid; Ahmed K Alzahrani
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.