Literature DB >> 21219730

Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 10. Alcohol-based antiseptics for hand disinfection and a comparison of their effectiveness with soaps.

Ewen C D Todd1, Barry S Michaels, John Holah, Debra Smith, Judy D Greig, Charles A Bartleson.   

Abstract

Alcohol compounds are increasingly used as a substitute for hand washing in health care environments and some public places because these compounds are easy to use and do not require water or hand drying materials. However, the effectiveness of these compounds depends on how much soil (bioburden) is present on the hands. Workers in health care environments and other public places must wash their hands before using antiseptics and/or wearing gloves. However, alcohol-based antiseptics, also called rubs and sanitizers, can be very effective for rapidly destroying some pathogens by the action of the aqueous alcohol solution without the need for water or drying with towels. Alcohol-based compounds seem to be the most effective treatment against gram-negative bacteria on lightly soiled hands, but antimicrobial soaps are as good or better when hands are more heavily contaminated. Instant sanitizers have no residual effect, unlike some antimicrobial soaps that retain antimicrobial activity after the hygienic action has been completed, e.g., after hand washing. Many alcohol-based hand rubs have antimicrobial agents added to them, but each formulation must be evaluated against the target pathogens in the environment of concern before being considered for use. Wipes also are widely used for quick cleanups of hands, other body parts, and surfaces. These wipes often contain alcohol and/or antimicrobial compounds and are used for personal hygiene where water is limited. However, antiseptics and wipes are not panaceas for every situation and are less effective in the presence of more than a light soil load and against most enteric viruses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21219730     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.11.2128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  13 in total

1.  Both Handwashing and an Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Intervention Reduce Soil and Microbial Contamination on Farmworker Hands during Harvest, but Produce Type Matters.

Authors:  Jessica L Prince-Guerra; Molly E Nace; Robert H Lyles; Anna M Fabiszewski de Aceituno; Faith E Bartz; James W Arbogast; Jennifer Gentry-Shields; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Norma Heredia; Santos García; Juan S Leon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Ethanol is indispensable for virucidal hand antisepsis: memorandum from the alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) Task Force, WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, and the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Axel Kramer; Mardjan Arvand; Bärbel Christiansen; Stephanie Dancer; Maren Eggers; Martin Exner; Dieter Müller; Nico T Mutters; Ingeborg Schwebke; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.454

3.  Ethanol and isopropanol in concentrations present in hand sanitizers sharply reduce excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and eliminate oral infectivity of Giardia cysts in gerbils.

Authors:  Aparajita Chatterjee; Giulia Bandini; Edwin Motari; John Samuelson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Hand Hygiene: Knowledge and Attitudes of Fourth-Year Clerkship Medical Students at Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Reem Hamadah; Razan Kharraz; Airabab Alshanqity; Danah AlFawaz; Abdulaziz M Eshaq; Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-08-24

5.  Killing of diverse eye pathogens (Acanthamoeba spp., Fusarium solani, and Chlamydia trachomatis) with alcohols.

Authors:  Yousuf Aqeel; Raquel Rodriguez; Aparajita Chatterjee; Robin R Ingalls; John Samuelson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-02-09

6.  Hand hygiene knowledge and attitude of medical students in western Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Marwan A Bakarman; Mukhtiar Baig; Ahmad A Malik; Zohair J Gazzaz; Mostafa M Mostafa; Mohamed A Zayed; Abdulaziz S Balubaid; Ahmed K Alzahrani
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Hand Hygiene Habits of Ghanaian Youths in Accra.

Authors:  Timothy B Oppong; Haiyan Yang; Cecilia Amponsem-Boateng; Guangcai Duan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  N 2 gas plasma inactivates influenza virus by inducing changes in viral surface morphology, protein, and genomic RNA.

Authors:  Akikazu Sakudo; Naohiro Shimizu; Yuichiro Imanishi; Kazuyoshi Ikuta
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Hand Sanitizer in a Pandemic: Wrong Formulations in the Wrong Hands.

Authors:  Amir A Hakimi; William B Armstrong
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 10.  Hydrogels in Hand Sanitizers.

Authors:  Carla Villa; Eleonora Russo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.