BACKGROUND: There is a need for low-technology, inexpensive screening tools for active tuberculosis (TB) case finding. OBJECTIVE: to assess the potential usefulness of measuring exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison in Hanoi, Viet Nam, comparing 90 consecutive smear-positive, culture-confirmed TB patients presenting at a referral hospital with office workers (no X-ray confirming TB) at this hospital (n = 52) and at a construction firm (n = 84). eNO levels were analysed using a validated handheld analyser. RESULTS: eNO levels among TB patients (median 15 parts per billion [ppb], interquartile range [IQR] 10-20) were equal to those among construction firm workers (15 ppb, IQR 12-19, P = 0.517) but higher than those among hospital workers (8.5 ppb, IQR 5-12.5, P < 0.001). Taking the hospital workers as the comparison group, best performance as a diagnostic tool was at a cut-off of 10 ppb, with sensitivity 78% (95%CI 68-86) and specificity 62% (95%CI 47-75). Test characteristics could be optimised to 84% vs. 67% by excluding individuals who had recently smoked or consumed alcohol. CONCLUSION: While eNO measurement has limited value in the direct diagnosis of pulmonary TB, it may be worth developing and evaluating as a cost-effective replacement of chest X-ray in screening algorithms of pulmonary TB where X-ray is not available.
BACKGROUND: There is a need for low-technology, inexpensive screening tools for active tuberculosis (TB) case finding. OBJECTIVE: to assess the potential usefulness of measuring exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison in Hanoi, Viet Nam, comparing 90 consecutive smear-positive, culture-confirmed TB patients presenting at a referral hospital with office workers (no X-ray confirming TB) at this hospital (n = 52) and at a construction firm (n = 84). eNO levels were analysed using a validated handheld analyser. RESULTS: eNO levels among TB patients (median 15 parts per billion [ppb], interquartile range [IQR] 10-20) were equal to those among construction firm workers (15 ppb, IQR 12-19, P = 0.517) but higher than those among hospital workers (8.5 ppb, IQR 5-12.5, P < 0.001). Taking the hospital workers as the comparison group, best performance as a diagnostic tool was at a cut-off of 10 ppb, with sensitivity 78% (95%CI 68-86) and specificity 62% (95%CI 47-75). Test characteristics could be optimised to 84% vs. 67% by excluding individuals who had recently smoked or consumed alcohol. CONCLUSION: While eNO measurement has limited value in the direct diagnosis of pulmonary TB, it may be worth developing and evaluating as a cost-effective replacement of chest X-ray in screening algorithms of pulmonary TB where X-ray is not available.
Authors: Antonia M I Saktiawati; David Dwi Putera; Althaf Setyawan; Yodi Mahendradhata; Tjip S van der Werf Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Lili Kang; Lesley Workman; Heather J Zar; Jane E Hill; Carly A Bobak; Lindy Bateman; Mohammad S Khan; Margaretha Prins; Lloyd May; Flavio A Franchina; Cynthia Baard; Mark P Nicol Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: José W López; Maria-Cristina I Loader; Daniel Smith; Daniel Pastorius; Marjory Bravard; Luz Caviedes; Karina M Romero; Taryn Clark; William Checkley; Eduardo Ticona; Jon S Friedland; Robert H Gilman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 2.345