Literature DB >> 21219572

Gender differences in liver donor quality are predictive of graft loss.

J C Lai1, S Feng, J P Roberts, N A Terrault.   

Abstract

Some studies have found that donor-recipient gender mismatch predicts posttransplant outcomes but whether this is independent of donor quality is unknown. To evaluate the association between gender mismatch and graft loss, 11 508 females (F) and 16 714 males (M) who underwent liver transplant from March 1, 2002 to December 31, 2007 were studied. Of 11 donor characteristics, clinically relevant differences between F and M donors were median age (47 vs. 39 years), height (165 vs. 178 cm) and proportion dying of stroke (59 vs. 35%) (p < 0.001 for all). The donor risk index was significantly lower for F than M donors (1.3 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001). Recipients of gender-mismatched grafts had an 11% higher risk of graft loss (p < 0.001). Compared to M→M donor-recipient-matched transplants in univariable analysis, F→M mismatch was associated with a 17% increased risk of graft loss (95% CI = 1.11-1.24, p < 0.001), whereas M→F mismatch was not (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.96-1.09; p = 0.46). However, adjustment for significant recipient and donor factors eliminated the association between F→M mismatch and graft loss (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.89-1.02; p = 0.18). In conclusion, donor quality differs significantly between female and male donors-female donors are older, shorter and die more frequently of stroke-and gender differences in donor quality, rather than gender mismatch are predictive of graft loss. ©2011 The Authors Journal compilation©2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21219572      PMCID: PMC3076602          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  18 in total

1.  Weight of the obesity epidemic: rising stroke rates among middle-aged women in the United States.

Authors:  Amytis Towfighi; Ling Zheng; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Rodica E Petrea; Alexa S Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Carlos S Kase; Philip A Wolf
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lisa M Forman; James D Lewis; Jesse A Berlin; Harold I Feldman; Michael R Lucey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Role of gender and race mismatch and graft failure in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  Vinod K Rustgi; Gustavo Marino; Michael T Halpern; Lynt B Johnson; Walter O Umana; Christine Tolleris
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Morbidity figures from general practice: sex differences in traumatology.

Authors:  Toine Lagro-Janssen; Janja Grosicar
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  The effect of donor gender on graft survival.

Authors:  Martin Zeier; Bernd Döhler; Gerhard Opelz; Eberhard Ritz
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Sex mismatch in heart transplantation is associated with increased number of severe rejection episodes and shorter long-term survival.

Authors:  H Welp; T Spieker; M Erren; H H Scheld; H A Baba; J Stypmann
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Factors differentially correlated with the outcome of liver transplantation in hcv+ and HCV- recipients.

Authors:  Ergun Velidedeoglu; Kevin C Mange; Adam Frank; Peter Abt; Niraj M Desai; Joseph W Markmann; Rajender Reddy; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.

Authors:  Cynthia A Moylan; Carla W Brady; Jeffrey L Johnson; Alastair D Smith; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Transplantation: Sharing of donated livers is not equal.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Risk of advanced fibrosis with grafts from hepatitis C antibody-positive donors: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai; Jacqueline G O'Leary; James F Trotter; Elizabeth C Verna; Robert S Brown; R Todd Stravitz; Jeffrey D Duman; Lisa M Forman; Norah A Terrault
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Ge; Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Richard Gilroy; Evelyn K Hsu; John P Roberts; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Impact of body mass index on outcomes of 48281 patients undergoing first time cadaveric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; Scott Hurton; Matthew Cwinn; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

5.  Higher Risk of Posttransplant Liver Graft Failure in Male Recipients of Female Donor Grafts Might Not Be Due to Anastomotic Size Disparity.

Authors:  Kyo Won Lee; Sangbin Han; Sanghoon Lee; Hyun-Hwa Cha; Soohyun Ahn; Hyeon Seon Ahn; Justin Sangwook Ko; Mi Sook Gwak; Gaab Soo Kim; Jae-Won Joh; Suk-Koo Lee; Gyu-Seong Choi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Stereological assessment of sexual dimorphism in the rat liver reveals differences in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells but not hepatic stellate cells.

Authors:  Ricardo Marcos; Célia Lopes; Fernanda Malhão; Carla Correia-Gomes; Sónia Fonseca; Margarida Lima; Rolf Gebhardt; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Female gender in the setting of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kryssia Isabel Rodríguez-Castro; Eleonora De Martin; Martina Gambato; Silvia Lazzaro; Erica Villa; Patrizia Burra
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

8.  Donor Factors Including Donor Risk Index Predict Fibrosis Progression, Allograft Loss, and Patient Survival following Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Virus.

Authors:  Arun Jesudian; Sameer Desale; Jonathan Julia; Elizabeth Landry; Christopher Maxwell; Bhaskar Kallakury; Jacqueline Laurin; Kirti Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-12

9.  Influence of donor-recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts.

Authors:  Zhiwei Li; Shengmin Mei; Jie Xiang; Jie Zhou; Qijun Zhang; Sheng Yan; Lin Zhou; Zhenhua Hu; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Correlation of Hepatic and Systemic Hemodynamics During Liver Transplantation: Quantification of Hepatic Resistance as an Actual Value.

Authors:  An-Chieh Feng; Teng-Wei Chen; Hsiu-Lung Fan; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Chung-Bao Hsieh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.