OBJECTIVE: To compare craniofacial morphology for individuals with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate between the ages of 6 and 12 years. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four North American cleft palate centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 148 subjects with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were consecutively treated at the four centers. METHODS: The 148 preorthodontic lateral cephalometric radiographs were scanned, scaled, digitized, and coded to blind the examiners to radiograph origin. On each radiograph, 18 (angular and ratio) cephalometric measurements were performed. Measurement means, by center, were compared using analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for sagittal maxillary prominence among the four centers. The most significant difference was seen between Center B (lowest SNA) and Center C (highest SNA). Similar differences were seen at the soft tissue level, with Center C showing a significantly larger ANB angle compared with Centers B and D. Center C was also shown to have statistically greater mean soft tissue convexity than Centers B, D, and E. The mean nasolabial angle in Center B was significantly more acute than in Centers C, D, and E. No statistically significant differences were seen for mandibular prominence, vertical dimensions, or dental inclinations. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were seen among the centers for hard and soft tissue maxillary prominence, but not for mandibular prominence, vertical dimensions, or dental inclinations. A modest but statistically significant (p < .001) negative correlation was found between Goslon scores and ANB angle (r = -.607).
OBJECTIVE: To compare craniofacial morphology for individuals with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate between the ages of 6 and 12 years. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four North American cleft palate centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 148 subjects with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were consecutively treated at the four centers. METHODS: The 148 preorthodontic lateral cephalometric radiographs were scanned, scaled, digitized, and coded to blind the examiners to radiograph origin. On each radiograph, 18 (angular and ratio) cephalometric measurements were performed. Measurement means, by center, were compared using analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for sagittal maxillary prominence among the four centers. The most significant difference was seen between Center B (lowest SNA) and Center C (highest SNA). Similar differences were seen at the soft tissue level, with Center C showing a significantly larger ANB angle compared with Centers B and D. Center C was also shown to have statistically greater mean soft tissue convexity than Centers B, D, and E. The mean nasolabial angle in Center B was significantly more acute than in Centers C, D, and E. No statistically significant differences were seen for mandibular prominence, vertical dimensions, or dental inclinations. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were seen among the centers for hard and soft tissue maxillary prominence, but not for mandibular prominence, vertical dimensions, or dental inclinations. A modest but statistically significant (p < .001) negative correlation was found between Goslon scores and ANB angle (r = -.607).
Authors: Thomas J Sitzman; Adam C Carle; Jaclyn N Lundberg; Pamela C Heaton; Michael A Helmrath; Carroll-Ann Trotman; Maria T Britto Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Date: 2019-10-09
Authors: Montserrat Caballero; Donna C Jones; Zhengyuan Shan; Sajjad Soleimani; John A van Aalst Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Montserrat Caballero; Justin C Morse; Alexandra E Halevi; Omri Emodi; Michael R Pharaon; Jeyhan S Wood; John A van Aalst Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Carrie L Heike; Laura P Stueckle; Erik T Stuhaug; Luiz A Pimenta; Amelia F Drake; Daniela Vivaldi; Kathleen C Y Sie; Craig B Birgfeld Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Isabelle Citron; Ingrid Ganske; Benjamin B Massenburg; Michael Doyle; John G Meara; Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2018-08-16
Authors: Thomas J Sitzman; Constance A Mara; Ross E Long; John Daskalogiannakis; Kathleen A Russell; Ana M Mercado; Ronald R Hathaway; Adam C Carle; Gunvor Semb; William C Shaw Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2015-08-10