Literature DB >> 21218909

Central auditory processing of noncontextual consonance in music: an evoked potential study.

Kosuke Itoh1, Shugo Suwazono, Tsutomu Nakada.   

Abstract

The consonance of individual chords presented out of musical context, or the noncontextual consonance of chords, is usually defined as the absence of roughness, which is a sensation perceived when slightly mistuned frequencies are not clearly resolved in the cochlea. The present work uses evoked potentials to demonstrate that the absence of roughness is not sufficient to explain the entirety of noncontextual consonance perception. Presented with a random sequence of various pure-tone intervals (0-13 semitones), listeners' cerebral cortical activities distinguished these stimuli according to their noncontextual consonance in a manner consistent with standard musical practice, even when the intervals exceeded the critical bandwidth (approximately three semitones). The roughness-based model of noncontextual consonance could not account for this result because these wide intervals had indistinguishably low levels of roughness. Further, this effect was evident only in musicians, indicating plasticity in the underlying neural mechanisms. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that, although the absence of roughness may represent an important aspect of noncontextual consonance, properties of intervals other than those related to roughness also contribute to this perception, underpinned by neural activity in the central auditory system that can be plastically modified by experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218909     DOI: 10.1121/1.3500685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve responses predict pitch attributes related to musical consonance-dissonance for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Further characterization of "subject's own name (SON) negativity," an ERP component reflecting early preattentive detection of SON.

Authors:  Toshihiko Tateuchi; Kosuke Itoh; Tsutomu Nakada
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-05-12

3.  (Dis-)Harmony in movement: effects of musical dissonance on movement timing and form.

Authors:  Naeem Komeilipoor; Matthew W M Rodger; Cathy M Craig; Paola Cesari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensory cortical response to uncertainty and low salience during recognition of affective cues in musical intervals.

Authors:  Fernando Bravo; Ian Cross; Emmanuel Andreas Stamatakis; Martin Rohrmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Early neural responses underlie advantages for consonance over dissonance.

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Júlia Monte-Ordoño; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Modeling and MEG evidence of early consonance processing in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alejandro Tabas; Martin Andermann; Valeria Schuberth; Helmut Riedel; Emili Balaguer-Ballester; André Rupp
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Neural correlates of acoustic dissonance in music: The role of musicianship, schematic and veridical expectations.

Authors:  Carlota Pagès-Portabella; Mila Bertolo; Juan M Toro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13

9.  How Different Are Our Perceptions of Equal-Tempered and Microtonal Intervals? A Behavioural and EEG Survey.

Authors:  Freya Bailes; Roger T Dean; Mary C Broughton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.