BACKGROUND:Nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) can be from various causes, including the use of high-dose cytarabine. METHODS: The authors compared 2 schedules of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with AML receiving high-dosecytarabine. Patients were randomized to: 1) ondansetron, 8 mg intravenously (IV), followed by 24 mg continuous infusion 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine and until 12 hours after the high-dose cytarabine infusion ended; 2) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before chemotherapy, daily from Day 1 of high-dose cytarabine up to Day 5; or 3) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine on Days 1, 3, and 5. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients on ondansetron and 48 patients on each of the palonosetron arms were evaluable for efficacy. Patients in the palonosetron arms achieved higher complete response rates (no emetic episodes plus no rescue medication), but the difference was not statistically significant (ondansetron, 21%; palonosetron on Days 1-5, 31%; palonosetron on Days 1, 3, and 5, 35%; P = .32). Greater than 77% of patients in each arm were free of nausea on Day 1; however, on Days 2 through 5, the proportion of patients without nausea declined similarly in all 3 groups. On Days 6 and 7, significantly more patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 were free of nausea (P = .001 and P = .0247, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The daily assessments of emesis did not show significant differences between the study arms. Patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 had significantly less severe nausea and experienced significantly less impact of CINV on daily activities on Days 6 and 7. Cancer 2010.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) can be from various causes, including the use of high-dose cytarabine. METHODS: The authors compared 2 schedules of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with AML receiving high-dose cytarabine. Patients were randomized to: 1) ondansetron, 8 mg intravenously (IV), followed by 24 mg continuous infusion 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine and until 12 hours after the high-dose cytarabine infusion ended; 2) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before chemotherapy, daily from Day 1 of high-dose cytarabine up to Day 5; or 3) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine on Days 1, 3, and 5. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients on ondansetron and 48 patients on each of the palonosetron arms were evaluable for efficacy. Patients in the palonosetron arms achieved higher complete response rates (no emetic episodes plus no rescue medication), but the difference was not statistically significant (ondansetron, 21%; palonosetron on Days 1-5, 31%; palonosetron on Days 1, 3, and 5, 35%; P = .32). Greater than 77% of patients in each arm were free of nausea on Day 1; however, on Days 2 through 5, the proportion of patients without nausea declined similarly in all 3 groups. On Days 6 and 7, significantly more patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 were free of nausea (P = .001 and P = .0247, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The daily assessments of emesis did not show significant differences between the study arms. Patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 had significantly less severe nausea and experienced significantly less impact of CINV on daily activities on Days 6 and 7. Cancer 2010.
Authors: M S Aapro; S M Grunberg; G M Manikhas; G Olivares; T Suarez; S A Tjulandin; L F Bertoli; F Yunus; B Morrica; F Lordick; A Macciocchi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jørn Herrstedt; Hyman B Muss; David G Warr; Paul J Hesketh; Peter D Eisenberg; Harry Raftopoulos; Steven M Grunberg; Munir Gabriel; Anthony Rodgers; Carolyn M Hustad; Kevin J Horgan; Franck Skobieranda Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Gralla; M Lichinitser; S Van Der Vegt; H Sleeboom; J Mezger; C Peschel; G Tonini; R Labianca; A Macciocchi; M Aapro Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Peter Eisenberg; Jazmin Figueroa-Vadillo; Rosalio Zamora; Veena Charu; Julio Hajdenberg; Alan Cartmell; Alberto Macciocchi; Steven Grunberg Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E H Wong; R Clark; E Leung; D Loury; D W Bonhaus; L Jakeman; H Parnes; R L Whiting; R M Eglen Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Marko Popovic; David G Warr; Carlo Deangelis; May Tsao; Kelvin K W Chan; Michael Poon; Cheryl Yip; Natalie Pulenzas; Henry Lam; Liying Zhang; Edward Chow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michelle Zhou; Marko Popovic; Mark Pasetka; Natalie Pulenzas; Soha Ahrari; Edward Chow; Carlo DeAngelis Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Erik Blondal; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Charlene Soobiah; Afshin Vafaei; John Ivory; Lisa Strifler; Roberta Cardoso; Emily Reynen; Vera Nincic; Huda Ashoor; Joanne Ho; Carmen Ng; Christy Johnson; Erin Lillie; Jesmin Antony; Derek J Roberts; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Sharon E Straus Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 8.775