| Literature DB >> 21218051 |
G Swami1, Khushboo Gupta, K M Kymonil, Shubhini Saraf.
Abstract
The present research paper introduces soyabean nuggets powder, as a novel excipient with nutraceutical value for tablets containing cholesterol lowering drug, simvastatin. Experiments were carried out to evaluate the suitability of soyabean nuggets powder as a diluent by incorporating in tablet formulation of simvastatin. The formulation was compared with the marketed product to determine its relative efficacy. Soyabean nuggets powder was found to be a promising diluent for tablets for both pharmaceutical and nutraceutical purposes. Simavastatin soya tablet showed acceptable pharmacotechnical properties and assay requirement.Entities:
Keywords: In vitro drug release; novel excipient; powder characteristics; simvastatin; soyabean nuggets
Year: 2010 PMID: 21218051 PMCID: PMC3013577 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.73909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0250-474X Impact factor: 0.975
NUTRITIVE VALUE OF SOYABEAN AS COMPARED TO OTHER PER 100 G.
| Pulses | Protein (g) | Fat (g) | Calcium (mg) | Carbohydrate (g) | Energy (kcal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bengal gram dhal | 20.8 | 5.6 | 56 | 59.8 | 372 |
| Green gram dhal | 24.5 | 1.2 | 75 | 59.9 | 348 |
| Lentil | 25.1 | 0.7 | 69 | 59.0 | 343 |
| Dry peas | 19.7 | 1.1 | 75 | 56.5 | 315 |
| Rajmah | 22.9 | 1.3 | 260 | 60.6 | 346 |
| Soya bean | 43.2 | 19.5 | 240 | 20.9 | 432 |
COMPOSITION OF SOYBEAN NUGGETS (NUTRILA)
| Components | Quantity (%) |
|---|---|
| Protein | 53.55 |
| Fat | 0.8 |
| Moisture | 8 |
| Crude fibres | 15 |
| Carbohydrates | 33.5 |
| Ash | 6 |
| Calories (g/100 g) | 290 |
| Calcium content | 0.20 |
| Iron | 0.008 |
| Magnesium | 0.27 |
| Phosphorus | 0.58 |
| Potassium | 2.80 |
| Sodium | 0.02 |
COMPOSITION OF SIMVASTATIN SOYA TABLETS
| Ingredients | Formulation code | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | |
| Simvastatin | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soyabean | 94 | 89 | 84 | 79 | 74 | 69 |
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 12 | 17 | 22 | 28 | 33 | 38 |
| Polyvinyl pyrollidone | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Magnesium striate | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Talc | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
All the quantities expressed are in mg/tablet. Formulation F4 was selected as the best and used for further studies.
Fig. 1Photomicrograph of soyabean powder
Photomicrograph showing rough flattened particles of soyabean nuggets powder, magnification 100×.
CHARACTERSTICS OF SOYABEAN NUGGETS POWDER (NUTRILA)
| Characterstics | Observed value |
|---|---|
| Morphology | Rough flattened |
| Angle of repose | 40.61±2.144 |
| Bulk density | 0.63±0.001 |
| Tapped density | 0.68±0.014 |
| Hausner ratio | 1.066 |
| Percentage compressibility index | 6.26% |
| Ash value | 72.57% |
| Swelling capacity | 24% |
IR SPECTRUM OF SOYABEAN NUGGETS POWDER
| Peaks (cm−1) | Groups | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| 3334.64 | N-H | N-H Stretching |
| 3049.25 | CH | C-H Stretching |
| 1716.33 | CO | C-O Aliphatic acid |
| 1556, 1558 | NO | N-O Symmetric bending |
| 1313.48 | NO | NO2 (Nitro Compound) |
| 638.11 | CH | C-H Stretching |
Fig. 2IR spectrum of soyabean powder
IR Spectrogram of soyabean powder showing characteristic peaks
EVALUATION OF SIMVASTATIN SOYA TABLETS
| Parameter | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Bicovex tablets | Bicovex tablets | Bicovex tablets | Bicovex tablets | Bicovex tablets | Bicovex tablets |
| yellowish colour | yellowish colour | yellowish colour | yellowish colour | yellowish colour | yellowish colour | |
| Texture | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth |
| Weight variation mg±SD | 125 (8.18) | 125 (7.153) | 125 (7.26) | 125 (6.09) | 125 (7.38) | 125 (6.27) |
| Hardness kg/cm2±SD | Less than 0.5 | 1.5–2 (0.25) | 1.6–2 (0.70) | 2–2.5 (0.25) | 1–1.5 (0.25) | 1.5–2 (0.40) |
| Drug content (%)±SD | 99.75 (0.98) | 99.85 (0.99) | 99.91 (1.13) | 101.56 (1.12) | 98.58 (0.76) | 99.63 (0.96) |
| Drug release % (after 30 min.) | 92.23 | 89.92 | 91.33 | 96.56 | 95.66 | 96.01 |
| Friability (%) | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
The values indicate mean ± SD. Standard deviation is between parentheses, n=3.
Fig. 3Comparative in vitro release profile of F4 and marketed formulation
Pure drug (——), marketed formulation (——) and simvastatin soya tablet (——)
DATA FOR ONE WAY TEST OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) ACROSS FORMULATIONS F1 TO F6
| Comparison | p | q | |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-4 vs F-2 | 6 | 4.867 | Yes |
| F-4 vs F-3 | 5 | 4.648 | Yes |
| F-4 vs F-1 | 4 | 4.323 | Yes |
| F-4 vs F-5 | 3 | 3.795 | Yes |
| F-4 vs F-6 | 2 | 2.777 | Yes |
| F-6 vs F-2 | 5 | 4.648 | Yes |
| F-6 vs F-3 | 4 | 4.323 | Yes |
| F-6 vs F-1 | 3 | 3.795 | Yes |
| F-6 vs F-5 | 2 | 2.777 | Yes |
| F-5 vs F-2 | 4 | 4.323 | Yes |
| F-5 vs F-3 | 3 | 3.795 | Yes |
| F-5 vs F-1 | 2 | 2.777 | Yes |
| F-1 vs F-2 | 3 | 3.795 | Yes |
| F-1 vs F-3 | 2 | 2.777 | Yes |
| F-3 vs F-2 | 2 | 2.777 | Yes |
Fig. 4Stability profile for simvastatin soya tablets
Remaining percentage of simvastatin content at 40°/75% RH after 15, 30 and 45 days