Literature DB >> 21217162

Estimates of historical exposures by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy for pooled exposure--response analyses of North Carolina and South Carolina, USA asbestos textile cohorts.

John M Dement1, Dana Loomis, David Richardson, Susanne H Wolf, Eileen D Kuempel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop pooled size-specific asbestos fiber exposure estimates for North Carolina and South Carolina asbestos textile plants.
METHODS: Airborne sample data and prior exposure estimates by phase-contrast microscopy (PCM) for the two cohorts were reviewed and compared. Estimates by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for 160 membrane filter samples from all plant were pooled. Poisson regression models were developed to predict bivariate diameter/length airborne fiber size distributions based on independent categorical variables for fiber diameter, fiber length, plant, and exposure zone. The model predicted bivariate diameter/length distributions were expressed as the proportion of fibers in 28 size-specific cells and these data were used to calculate PCM to TEM adjustment factors in order to estimate fiber size-specific exposures for the pooled cohort.
RESULTS: Exposure levels in the North Carolina plants were in excess of 50 f/cc for many operations through about 1955 owing to lack of dust control measures in early years whereas levels in the South Carolina plant were generally less than 10 f/cc by about 1950. The Poisson regression models found covariates for plant department to be a stronger predictor of bivariate size proportions than plant; however, a plant effect was observed. The final Poisson models demonstrated good fit to the observed data.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with early studies, fiber exposures in the North Carolina plants were much higher than in South Carolina plant. Use of the predicted size-specific TEM exposures by plant and department based on the Poisson model predictions should reduce exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21217162     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.059972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  7 in total

1.  Size- and type-specific exposure assessment of an asbestos products factory in China.

Authors:  Midori N Courtice; D Wayne Berman; Eiji Yano; Norihiko Kohyama; Xiaorong Wang
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Asbestos standards: Impact of currently uncounted chrysotile asbestos fibers on lifetime lung cancer risk.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Alexander P Keil; Stephen R Cole; John Dement
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Airborne fiber size characterization in exposure estimation: Evaluation of a modified transmission electron microcopy protocol for asbestos and potential use for carbon nanotubes and nanofibers.

Authors:  John M Dement; Eileen D Kuempel; Ralph D Zumwalde; Anna M Ristich; Joseph E Fernback; Randall J Smith
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Analysis of occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer mortality using the g formula.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; David B Richardson; Haitao Chu; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of asbestos and lung cancer: is better quality exposure assessment associated with steeper slopes of the exposure-response relationships?

Authors:  Virissa Lenters; Roel Vermeulen; Sies Dogger; Leslie Stayner; Lützen Portengen; Alex Burdorf; Dick Heederik
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: a review of fiber size toxicity.

Authors:  Guillaume Boulanger; Pascal Andujar; Jean-Claude Pairon; Marie-Annick Billon-Galland; Chantal Dion; Pascal Dumortier; Patrick Brochard; Annie Sobaszek; Pierre Bartsch; Christophe Paris; Marie-Claude Jaurand
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Quantitative relationships of exposure to chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma mortality.

Authors:  Dana Loomis; David B Richardson; Leslie Elliott
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.