Literature DB >> 21217038

Interlaboratory comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction methods to detect Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever.

Rebecca M Jones1, Stefan Hertwig, James Pitman, Richard Vipond, Anna Aspán, Göran Bölske, Conall McCaughey, James P McKenna, Bart J van Rotterdam, Arnout de Bruin, Robin Ruuls, Rob Buijs, Hendrik-Jan Roest, Jason Sawyer.   

Abstract

The bacterium Coxiella burnetii, which has a wide host range, causes Q fever. Infection with C. burnetii can cause abortions, stillbirth, and the delivery of weak offspring in ruminants. Coxiella burnetii infection is zoonotic, and in human beings it can cause chronic, potentially fatal disease. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is increasingly being used to detect the organism and to aid in diagnosis both in human and animal cases. Many different real-time PCR methods, which target different genes, have been described. To assess the comparability of the C. burnetii real-time PCR assays in use in different European laboratories, a panel of nucleic acid extracts was dispatched to 7 separate testing centers. The testing centers included laboratories from both human and animal health agencies. Each laboratory tested the samples using their in-house real-time PCR methods. The results of this comparison show that the most common target gene for real-time PCR assays is the IS1111 repeat element that is present in multiple copies in the C. burnetii genome. Many laboratories also use additional real-time PCR tests that target single-copy genes. The results of the current study demonstrate that the assays in use in the different laboratories are comparable, with general agreement of results for the panel of samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21217038     DOI: 10.1177/104063871102300118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  6 in total

1.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Six Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus Proviral DNA.

Authors:  J P Jaworski; A Pluta; M Rola-Łuszczak; S L McGowan; C Finnegan; K Heenemann; H A Carignano; I Alvarez; K Murakami; L Willems; T W Vahlenkamp; K G Trono; B Choudhury; J Kuźmak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of Coxiella burnetii in complex matrices by using multiplex quantitative PCR during a major Q fever outbreak in The Netherlands.

Authors:  A de Bruin; A de Groot; L de Heer; J Bok; P R Wielinga; M Hamans; B J van Rotterdam; I Janse
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Coxiella burnetii infection in roe deer during Q fever epidemic, the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jolianne M Rijks; Hendrik I J Roest; Peter W van Tulden; Marja J L Kik; Jooske IJzer; Andrea Gröne
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Surveys on Coxiella burnetii infections in Swedish cattle, sheep, goats and moose.

Authors:  Anna Ohlson; Jonas Malmsten; Jenny Frössling; Göran Bölske; Anna Aspán; Anne-Marie Dalin; Ann Lindberg
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Detection of Coxiella burnetii in Ambient Air after a Large Q Fever Outbreak.

Authors:  Myrna M T de Rooij; Floor Borlée; Lidwien A M Smit; Arnout de Bruin; Ingmar Janse; Dick J J Heederik; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses.

Authors:  José T Canevari; Simon M Firestone; Gemma Vincent; Angus Campbell; Tabita Tan; Michael Muleme; Alexander W N Cameron; Mark A Stevenson
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.