Literature DB >> 21216889

If the radial artery is the new standard of care in primary percutaneous coronary intervention, why is most intervention done by the femoral approach?

Tiffany Patterson1, Rodney A Foale.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21216889     DOI： 10.1136/hrt.2010.207043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN： 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Left Radial Artery is Associated with Less Vascular Complications than Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Femoral Artery.

Authors:  Guoqing Qi; Qi Sun; Yue Xia; Liye Wei
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study.

Authors:  Michael Behnes; Melike Ünsal; Ursula Hoffmann; Christian Fastner; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Siegfried Lang; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ralf Lehmann; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-03

3.  Almanac 2011: Acute Coronary Syndromes. The National Society Journals Present Selected Research that has Driven Recent Advances in Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Charles Knight; Adam D Timmis
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2011
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.