| Literature DB >> 21216854 |
Albrecht Ingo Schmid1, Julia Szendroedi, Marek Chmelik, Martin Krssák, Ewald Moser, Michael Roden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Steatosis associates with insulin resistance and may even predict type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular complications. Because muscular insulin resistance relates to myocellular fat deposition and disturbed energy metabolism, we hypothesized that reduced hepatic ATP turnover (fATP) underlies insulin resistance and elevated hepatocellular lipid (HCL) contents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured hepatic fATP using (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with type 2 diabetes and age- and body mass-matched controls. Peripheral (M and M/I) and hepatic (suppression of endogenous glucose production) insulin sensitivity were assessed with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21216854 PMCID: PMC3024365 DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Care ISSN: 0149-5992 Impact factor: 19.112
Anthropometric and laboratory parameters
| Variable | Type 2 diabetes | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 9 (3) | 8 (4) | |
| Age (years) | 57.7 ± 6.1 | 60.1 ± 4.4 |
| Height (cm) | 174 ± 11 | 174 ± 10 |
| Body weight (kg) | 82 ± 14 | 78 ± 17 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 ± 3.4 | 25.1 ± 3.9 |
| A1C (%) | 7.06 ± 0.98 | 5.57 ± 0.27 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 100 ± 10 | 88 ± 19 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 8.8 ± 1.9 | 5.3 ± 0.6 |
| Fasting plasma insulin (mU/L) | 12.1 ± 3.9 | 8.5 ± 2.0 |
| Serum LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 119 ± 22 | 146 ± 33 |
| Serum HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 62 ± 9 | 59 ± 10 |
| Plasma triglyceride (mg/dL) | 163 ± 80 | 128 ± 79 |
| GGT (units/L) | 34 ± 17 | 27 ± 9 |
| AST (units/L) | 22 ± 5 | 24 ± 5 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, unless indicated otherwise.
*P < 0.001, significant differences between groups.
Figure 1Liver MR data of one patient with type 2 diabetes. A: Axial slice through the liver (gradient echo, prone position). The grid corresponds to the chemical shift imaging matrix. The voxels surrounded by the bold white line were selected for quantification. The MR spectrum corresponding to the “×” in the image is shown on the right panel. B: MR spectra from the saturation transfer experiment (solid line). The ATP resonance is completely suppressed, and the PI signal is lower than in the baseline control experiment (dashed line).
Liver fat, energy metabolism, and hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity
| Variable | Type 2 diabetes | Control |
|---|---|---|
| HCL (% signal) | 10.6 ± 9.3 | 8.2 ± 10.9 |
| Absolute PI (mmol/L) | 0.96 ± 0.19* | 1.38 ± 0.38 |
| 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | |
| fATP (mmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ min−1) | 16.2 ± 5.2 | 28.0 ± 13.0 |
| EGP baseline (mg ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1) | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| EGP suppression (%) | 72 ± 15 | 100 ± 17 |
| FFA baseline (µmol/L) | 569 ± 122 | 430 ± 260 |
| FFA suppression (%) | 95 ± 2* | 97 ± 2 |
| M (mg ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1) | 5.3 ± 1.3 | 7.5 ± 1.9 |
| M/I (mg ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1 ⋅ mU−1 ⋅ L) | 0.06 ± 0.03|| | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD. Significant differences between groups: *P = 0.011;
†P = 0.025;
‡P = 0.009;
§P = 0.003;
||P = 0.005.
Figure 2Correlations with hepatocellular ATP production (fATP) with (A) hepatic insulin resistance (EGP suppression; all: r = 0.77, P = 0.002; type 2 diabetic subjects: r = 0.79, P = 0.01; controls: r = 0.54, P = 0.17), (B) waist circumference (all: r = −0.78, P = 0.001; type 2 diabetic subjects: r = 0.57, P = 0.11; controls: r = 0.68, P = 0.064), (C) HCL contents (all: r = −0.51, P = 0.038; type 2 diabetic subjects r = −0.20, P = 0.61; controls: r = 0.62, P = 0.10), (D) hepatic concentrations of PI (all: r = 0.77, P = 0.0003; type 2 diabetic subjects: r = 0.57, P = 0.11; controls: r = 0.68, P = 0.064) across all participants (type 2 diabetic subjects: ●, controls: △).