David H Maciver1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Taunton & Somerset Hospital, Musgrove Park, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK. david.maciver@tst.nhs.uk
Abstract
AIMS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a suboptimal measure of ventricular function. Recent mathematical modelling of left ventricular contraction has shown that the EF is determined by both myocardial shortening (strain) and by end-diastolic wall thickness. Increasing end-diastolic wall thickness resulted in augmented radial wall thickening. This may result in a significant 'overestimation' of ventricular systolic function as assessed by the EF. This study proposes a new measure of ventricular systolic function, the corrected EF (EF(c)) to allow for the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study uses a new two-layer, three-dimensional mathematical model of ventricular contraction. Changes in end-diastolic wall thickness in addition to long-axis and mid-wall circumferential strain were modelled. Iso-strain lines were obtained where myocardial shortening (strain) is constant; EF increases with increasing end-diastolic wall thickness. The corrected EF is determined by following the iso-strain lines to the equivalent EF in the absence of hypertrophy (e.g. 9 mm thickness). For example, an individual with a mean end-diastolic wall thickness of 20 mm and measured EF of 60% has a corrected EF (EF(c)) of 37%. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the EF is determined by absolute wall thickening and provides a nomogram for comparing EF when LVH is present. The EF(c) is a potential new measure of left ventricular systolic function. Its possible role will need validating in mortality trials.
AIMS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a suboptimal measure of ventricular function. Recent mathematical modelling of left ventricular contraction has shown that the EF is determined by both myocardial shortening (strain) and by end-diastolic wall thickness. Increasing end-diastolic wall thickness resulted in augmented radial wall thickening. This may result in a significant 'overestimation' of ventricular systolic function as assessed by the EF. This study proposes a new measure of ventricular systolic function, the corrected EF (EF(c)) to allow for the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study uses a new two-layer, three-dimensional mathematical model of ventricular contraction. Changes in end-diastolic wall thickness in addition to long-axis and mid-wall circumferential strain were modelled. Iso-strain lines were obtained where myocardial shortening (strain) is constant; EF increases with increasing end-diastolic wall thickness. The corrected EF is determined by following the iso-strain lines to the equivalent EF in the absence of hypertrophy (e.g. 9 mm thickness). For example, an individual with a mean end-diastolic wall thickness of 20 mm and measured EF of 60% has a corrected EF (EF(c)) of 37%. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the EF is determined by absolute wall thickening and provides a nomogram for comparing EF when LVH is present. The EF(c) is a potential new measure of left ventricular systolic function. Its possible role will need validating in mortality trials.
Authors: Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues; Benjamin Rooms; Katie Hyde; Stephen Rohan; Angus K Nightingale; Julian Paton; Nathan Manghat; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Mark Hamilton; Henggui Zhang; David H MacIver Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Stephen Rohan; Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar; Adam Trickey; Gergely Szantho; Laura E K Ratcliffe; Amy E Burchell; Emma C Hart; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Mark C K Hamilton; Angus K Nightingale; Julian F R Paton; Nathan E Manghat; David H MacIver Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 3.738