BACKGROUND: The concept of cancer-related anorexia/cachexia is evolving as its mechanisms are better understood. To support consensus processes towards an updated definition and classification system, we systematically reviewed the literature for items and domains associated with involuntary weight loss in cancer. METHODS: Two search strings (cachexia, cancer) explored five databases from 1976 to 2007. Citations, abstracts and papers were included if they were original work, in English/German language, and explored an item to distinguish advanced cancer patients with variable degrees of involuntary weight loss. The items were grouped into the 5 domains proposed by formal expert meetings. RESULTS: Of 14,344 citations, 1275 abstracts and 585 papers reviewed, 71 papers were included (6325 patients; 40-50% gastrointestinal, 10-20% lung cancer). No single domain or item could consistently distinguish cancer patients with or without weight loss or having various degrees of weight loss. Anorexia and decreased nutritional intake were unexpectedly weakly related with weight loss. Explanations for this could be the imprecise measurement methods for nutritional intake, symptom interactions, and the importance of systemic inflammation as a catabolic drive. Data on muscle mass and strength is scarce and the impact of cachexia on physical and psychosocial function has not been widely assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Current data support a modular concept of cancer cachexia with a variable combination of reduced nutritional intake and catabolic/hyper-metabolic changes. The heterogeneity in the literature revealed by this review underlines the importance of an agreed definition and classification of cancer cachexia.
BACKGROUND: The concept of cancer-related anorexia/cachexia is evolving as its mechanisms are better understood. To support consensus processes towards an updated definition and classification system, we systematically reviewed the literature for items and domains associated with involuntary weight loss in cancer. METHODS: Two search strings (cachexia, cancer) explored five databases from 1976 to 2007. Citations, abstracts and papers were included if they were original work, in English/German language, and explored an item to distinguish advanced cancerpatients with variable degrees of involuntary weight loss. The items were grouped into the 5 domains proposed by formal expert meetings. RESULTS: Of 14,344 citations, 1275 abstracts and 585 papers reviewed, 71 papers were included (6325 patients; 40-50% gastrointestinal, 10-20% lung cancer). No single domain or item could consistently distinguish cancerpatients with or without weight loss or having various degrees of weight loss. Anorexia and decreased nutritional intake were unexpectedly weakly related with weight loss. Explanations for this could be the imprecise measurement methods for nutritional intake, symptom interactions, and the importance of systemic inflammation as a catabolic drive. Data on muscle mass and strength is scarce and the impact of cachexia on physical and psychosocial function has not been widely assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Current data support a modular concept of cancer cachexia with a variable combination of reduced nutritional intake and catabolic/hyper-metabolic changes. The heterogeneity in the literature revealed by this review underlines the importance of an agreed definition and classification of cancer cachexia.
Authors: Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; Trude Rakel Balstad; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Cinzia Brunelli; Anne Kari Knudsen; Stein Kaasa; Morten Thronæs; Barry Laird; Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Maria Rohm; Michaela Schäfer; Victor Laurent; Bilgen Ekim Üstünel; Katharina Niopek; Carolyn Algire; Oksana Hautzinger; Tjeerd P Sijmonsma; Annika Zota; Dasa Medrikova; Natalia S Pellegata; Mikael Ryden; Agné Kulyte; Ingrid Dahlman; Peter Arner; Natasa Petrovic; Barbara Cannon; Ez-Zoubir Amri; Bruce E Kemp; Gregory R Steinberg; Petra Janovska; Jan Kopecky; Christian Wolfrum; Matthias Blüher; Mauricio Berriel Diaz; Stephan Herzig Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sriram Yennurajalingam; Jie S Willey; J Lynn Palmer; Julio Allo; Egidio Del Fabbro; Evan N Cohen; Sanda Tin; James M Reuben; Eduardo Bruera Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 2.947