Literature DB >> 21216513

Infectious complications following conversion to buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas: a quality improvement report.

Laura Labriola1, Ralph Crott, Christine Desmet, Geneviève André, Michel Jadoul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constant-site or buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) has gained in popularity compared with rope-ladder cannulation. However, cannulating nonhealed skin might increase the risk of (AVF-related) infectious events, as suggested by small reports. STUDY
DESIGN: Quality improvement report. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All patients on in-center hemodialysis therapy using a native AVF from January 1, 2001, to June 30, 2010. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Shift to buttonhole cannulation between August 2004 and January 2005. Because the infectious event rate increased after the shift, educational workshops were held in May 2008 for all nurses, with review of every step of buttonhole protocol. OUTCOMES: Infectious events (unexplained bacteremia caused by skin bacteria and/or local AVF infection) and complicated infectious events (resulting in metastatic infection, death, or AVF surgery) were ascertained during 4 periods: (1) rope-ladder technique in all, (2) switch to buttonhole, (3) buttonhole in all before workshops, and (4) buttonhole in all after workshops.
RESULTS: 177 patients (aged 70.4 ± 11.5 years) with 193 AVFs were analyzed, including 186,481 AVF-days. 57 infectious events occurred (0.31 events/1,000 AVF-days). The incidence of infectious events increased after the switch to the buttonhole method (0.17 [95% CI, 0.086-0.31], 0.11 [95% CI, 0.0014-0.63], and 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29-0.61] events/1,000 AVF-days in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P = 0.003). This reached significance during only the second full year of buttonhole cannulation. During period 4, the incidence tended to decrease (0.34 events/1,000 AVF-days). Complicated infectious events (n = 12) were virtually restricted to period 3 (n = 11; 0.153 [95% CI, 0.076-0.273] events/1,000 AVF-days), with a significant decrease in period 4 (n = 1; 0.024 [95% CI, 0.001-0.118] events/1,000 AVF-days; RR for period 3 vs period 4, 6.37 [95% CI, 1.09-138.4]; P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Observational partly retrospective design.
CONCLUSION: Intensive staff education regarding strict protocol for the buttonhole procedure was associated with a decrease in infectious events.
Copyright © 2011 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216513     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  15 in total

Review 1.  Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan; Simon P Curran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  A randomized trial comparing buttonhole with rope ladder needling in conventional hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae; Sofia B Ahmed; Rajneet Atkar; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Buttonhole versus Stepladder Cannulation for Home Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Shih-Han S Huang; Jennifer MacRae; Dana Ross; Rameez Imtiaz; Brittany Hollingsworth; Gihad E Nesrallah; Michael A Copland; Philip A McFarlane; Christopher T Chan; Deborah Zimmerman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Complications of the Arteriovenous Fistula: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Aiden R Liu; Charmaine E Lok; Joyce C Zhang; Louise M Moist
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Should Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistulas be Used? PRO.

Authors:  Laura Labriola
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-04-14

6.  Should Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistulas Be Used? CON.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-04-14

Review 7.  How to overcome barriers and establish a successful home HD program.

Authors:  Bessie A Young; Christopher Chan; Christopher Blagg; Robert Lockridge; Thomas Golper; Fred Finkelstein; Rachel Shaffer; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Buttonhole cannulation and clinical outcomes in a home hemodialysis cohort and systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher A Muir; Sradha S Kotwal; Carmel M Hawley; Kevan Polkinghorne; Martin P Gallagher; Paul Snelling; Meg J Jardine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Risk of Vascular Access Infection Associated With Buttonhole Cannulation of Fistulas: Data From the National Healthcare Safety Network.

Authors:  Meghan Lyman; Duc B Nguyen; Alicia Shugart; Heidi Gruhler; Christi Lines; Priti R Patel
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 11.072

10.  Cannulation technique and complications in arteriovenous fistulas: a Swedish Renal Registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Staaf; Anders Fernström; Fredrik Uhlin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.