Literature DB >> 21216471

Gender differences in 12-week antidepressant treatment outcomes for a naturalistic secondary care cohort: the CRESCEND study.

Su-Jin Yang1, Sun-Young Kim, Robert Stewart, Jae-Min Kim, Il-Seon Shin, Sung-Won Jung, Min-Soo Lee, Seung-Hee Jeong, Tae-Youn Jun.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether men and women with depression differ in socio-demographic, treatment-related characteristics, and in their responses to treatment with antidepressants, as well as to explore differences in treatment outcomes by menopausal status. From a nationwide sample of 18 hospitals in South Korea, 723 depressive patients were recruited. After baseline evaluation, they received naturalistic clinician-determined antidepressant interventions. Assessment scales for evaluating depression (HAMD), anxiety (HAMA), global severity (CGI-s), and functioning (SOFAS) were administered at baseline and re-evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks later. At baseline, women were older, less educated, less likely to be employed, had lower income, were more likely to be married, and had longer illness duration than men. There were no gender differences in the treatment-regime received. After adjustment for baseline status, women were more likely to achieve HAMD remission (OR=1.51), HAMD response (OR=1.64), and HAMA response (OR=1.61). Women also experienced shorter times to HAMD response, HAMA response, and CGI-s remission. Postmenopausal women showed higher HAMA response with newer dual action antidepressants than premenopausal women. Women were found to have better outcomes following antidepressant treatment than men, and postmenopausal women had a better response on anxiety symptoms with newer dual action antidepressants.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216471     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  8 in total

1.  Sex-specific bi‑directional association between osteoporosis and depression from the national representative data of South Korea.

Authors:  Min Kyoung Shin; Hyejin Kim; Soo-Hee Choi; Beom-Jun Kim; Obin Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Review of Cohort Studies for Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Hong Jin Jeon; Ji Hyun Baek; Yong-Min Ahn; Se Joo Kim; Tae Hyun Ha; Boseok Cha; Eunsoo Moon; Hee-Ju Kang; Vin Ryu; Chul-Hyun Cho; Jung-Yoon Heo; Kiwon Kim; Heon-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  Creatine target engagement with brain bioenergetics: a dose-ranging phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of adolescent females with SSRI-resistant depression.

Authors:  Douglas G Kondo; Lauren N Forrest; Xianfeng Shi; Young-Hoon Sung; Tracy L Hellem; Rebekah S Huber; Perry F Renshaw
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 4.  Sex differences in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression.

Authors:  John J Sramek; Michael F Murphy; Neal R Cutler
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.986

5.  Predictors of Cognitive Improvement during 12 Weeks of Antidepressant Treatment in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Jeong-Ok Lee; Ju-Wan Kim; Hee-Ju Kang; Jin-Pyo Hong; Jae-Min Kim
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray by sex in patients with treatment-resistant depression: findings from short-term randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Robyn R Jones; Marlene P Freeman; Susan G Kornstein; Kimberly Cooper; Ella J Daly; Carla M Canuso; Susan Nicholson
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  The Role of Mitochondria in Mood Disorders: From Physiology to Pathophysiology and to Treatment.

Authors:  Anna Giménez-Palomo; Seetal Dodd; Gerard Anmella; Andre F Carvalho; Giselli Scaini; Joao Quevedo; Isabella Pacchiarotti; Eduard Vieta; Michael Berk
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Sampling bias in an internet treatment trial for depression.

Authors:  L Donkin; I B Hickie; H Christensen; S L Naismith; B Neal; N L Cockayne; N Glozier
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.