Literature DB >> 21216071

Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparisons among unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid plate, poly-L-lactic acid plate, and titanium plate.

Koichiro Ueki1, Katsuhiko Okabe, Mao Miyazaki, Aya Mukozawa, Akinori Moroi, Kohei Marukawa, Kiyomasa Nakagawa, Etsuhide Yamamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the time-course changes in condylar long-axis and skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with an unsintered hydroxyapatite (u-HA)/poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) plate, PLLA plate, or titanium plate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 60 Japanese patients diagnosed with mandibular prognathism, 20 underwent SSRO with a u-HA/PLLA plate system, 20 underwent SSRO with a PLLA plate system, and 20 underwent SSRO with a conventional titanium plate system. The time-course changes in condylar long-axis and skeletal stability were assessed by use of axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms.
RESULTS: Compared with the u-HA/PLLA group, the titanium group showed a significantly greater change in the right condyle angle between initially and 1 month (P = .0105) and intercondylar axes angle between 1 and 3 months (P = .0013). The PLLA group showed a significantly greater change than the titanium group (P = .0043) and u-HA/PLLA group (P = .0002) in terms of ramus inclination between 1 and 3 months; however, there were no significant differences among the 3 groups in the other measurements for each time interval.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are no significant differences in postoperative time-course changes among a u-HA/PLLA plate system, PLLA plate system, and conventional titanium plate system.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216071     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.

Authors:  Safieh Albougha; Mhd Hassan Albogha; Mhd Ayham Darwich; Khaldoun Darwich
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-19

Review 2.  Customized Barrier Membrane (Titanium Alloy, Poly Ether-Ether Ketone and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactide) for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; Jin Liu; Mi Du; Shengben Zhang; Yue Liu; Hu Yang; Ruiwen Shi; Yuanyuan Guo; Feng Song; Yajun Zhao; Jing Lan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Comparative study on long-term stability in mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide mesh versus titanium miniplate.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park; Hyun-Sik Kang; Jang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Huy Xuan Ngo; Yunpeng Bai; Jingjing Sha; Shinji Ishizuka; Erina Toda; Rie Osako; Akira Kato; Reon Morioka; Mrunalini Ramanathan; Hiroto Tatsumi; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.