Literature DB >> 21215304

Models of trace decay, eligibility for reinforcement, and delay of reinforcement gradients, from exponential to hyperboloid.

Peter R Killeen1.   

Abstract

Behavior such as depression of a lever or perception of a stimulus may be strengthened by consequent behaviorally significant events (BSEs), such as reinforcers. This is the Law of Effect. As time passes since its emission, the ability for the behavior to be reinforced decreases. This is trace decay. It is upon decayed traces that subsequent BSEs operate. If the trace comes from a response, it constitutes primary reinforcement; if from perception of an extended stimulus, it is classical conditioning. This paper develops simple models of these processes. It premises exponentially decaying traces related to the richness of the environment, and conditioned reinforcement as the average of such traces over the extended stimulus, yielding an almost-hyperbolic function of duration. The models account for some data, and reinforce the theories of other analysts by providing a sufficient account of the provenance of these effects. It leads to a linear relation between sooner and later isopreference delays whose slope depends on sensitivity to reinforcement, and intercept on that and the steepness of the delay gradient. Unlike human prospective judgments, all control is vested in either primary or secondary reinforcement processes; therefore the use of the term discounting, appropriate for humans, may be less descriptive of the behavior of nonverbal organisms.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21215304     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  19 in total

1.  Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on performance on a progressive ratio schedule.

Authors:  Lourdes Valencia-Torres; C M Bradshaw; Arturo Bouzas; Enrique Hong; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  A framework for understanding and advancing intertemporal choice research using rodent models.

Authors:  Wambura C Fobbs; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Delay discounting as impaired valuation: Delayed rewards in an animal obesity model.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Jennifer L Hudnall; Luanne Hale; Stephen C Fowler; Marco Bortolato; Shea M Lemley; Michael J Sofis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Determinants of choice, and vulnerability and recovery in addiction.

Authors:  R J Lamb; David R Maguire; Brett C Ginsburg; Jonathan W Pinkston; Charles P France
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Role of ionotropic glutamate receptors in delay and probability discounting in the rat.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Seth R Batten; Michael T Bardo; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

9.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Lauren C Kettle; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.