J Brown1, C Stauber, J L Murphy, A Khan, T Mu, M Elliott, M D Sobsey. 1. Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. joe.brown@lshtm.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: Escherichia coli is the pre-eminent microbiological indicator used to assess safety of drinking water globally. The cost and equipment requirements for processing samples by standard methods may limit the scale of water quality testing in technologically less developed countries and other resource-limited settings, however. We evaluate here the use of ambient-temperature incubation in detection of E. coli in drinking water samples as a potential cost-saving and convenience measure with applications in regions with high (>25°C) mean ambient temperatures. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study includes data from three separate water quality assessments: two in Cambodia and one in the Dominican Republic. Field samples of household drinking water were processed in duplicate by membrane filtration (Cambodia), Petrifilm™ (Cambodia) or Colilert® (Dominican Republic) on selective media at both standard incubation temperature (35–37°C) and ambient temperature, using up to three dilutions and three replicates at each dilution. Matched sample sets were well correlated with 80% of samples (n = 1037) within risk-based microbial count strata (E. coli CFU 100 ml−1 counts of <1, 1–10, 11–100, 101–1000, >1000), and a pooled coefficient of variation of 17% (95% CI 15–20%) for paired sample sets across all methods. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ambient-temperature incubation of E. coli in at least some settings may yield sufficiently robust data for water safety monitoring where laboratory or incubator access is limited.
AIMS: Escherichia coli is the pre-eminent microbiological indicator used to assess safety of drinking water globally. The cost and equipment requirements for processing samples by standard methods may limit the scale of water quality testing in technologically less developed countries and other resource-limited settings, however. We evaluate here the use of ambient-temperature incubation in detection of E. coli in drinking water samples as a potential cost-saving and convenience measure with applications in regions with high (>25°C) mean ambient temperatures. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study includes data from three separate water quality assessments: two in Cambodia and one in the Dominican Republic. Field samples of household drinking water were processed in duplicate by membrane filtration (Cambodia), Petrifilm™ (Cambodia) or Colilert® (Dominican Republic) on selective media at both standard incubation temperature (35–37°C) and ambient temperature, using up to three dilutions and three replicates at each dilution. Matched sample sets were well correlated with 80% of samples (n = 1037) within risk-based microbial count strata (E. coli CFU 100 ml−1 counts of <1, 1–10, 11–100, 101–1000, >1000), and a pooled coefficient of variation of 17% (95% CI 15–20%) for paired sample sets across all methods. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ambient-temperature incubation of E. coli in at least some settings may yield sufficiently robust data for water safety monitoring where laboratory or incubator access is limited.
Authors: Alice Wang; Lanakila McMahan; Shea Rutstein; Christine Stauber; Jorge Reyes; Mark D Sobsey Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Robert Bain; Jamie Bartram; Mark Elliott; Robert Matthews; Lanakila McMahan; Rosalind Tung; Patty Chuang; Stephen Gundry Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mustafa Sikder; Elena N Naumova; Anthonia O Ogudipe; Mateo Gomez; Daniele Lantagne Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Robert E S Bain; Claire Woodall; John Elliott; Benjamin F Arnold; Rosalind Tung; Robert Morley; Martella du Preez; Jamie K Bartram; Anthony P Davis; Stephen W Gundry; Stephen Pedley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: D Daniel; Arnt Diener; Jack van de Vossenberg; Madan Bhatta; Sara J Marks Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390