Literature DB >> 21214327

Response to intracranial hypertension treatment as a predictor of death in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Arash Farahvar1, Linda M Gerber, Ya-Lin Chiu, Roger Härtl, Matteus Froelich, Nancy Carney, Jamshid Ghajar.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The normalization of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is assumed to limit secondary brain injury and improve outcome. Despite evidence-based recommendations for monitoring and treatment of elevated ICP, there are few studies that show an association between response to ICP-directed therapeutic regimens and adjusted mortality rate. This study utilizes a large prospective database to examine the effect of response to ICP-lowering therapy on risk of death within the first 2 weeks of injury in patients who sustained TBI and are older than 16 years.
METHODS: The current study is based on 1426 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) of whom 388 were treated for elevated ICP (> 25 mm Hg) between 2000 and 2008 at 22 trauma centers enrolled in a New York State quality improvement program. This prospectively collected database also contains information including age, admission GCS score, pupillary status, CT scanning parameters, and hypotension, which are all known early prognostic indicators of death. Treatment of elevated ICP consisted of administration of mannitol, hypertonic saline, barbiturates, and/or drainage of CSF or decompressive craniectomy. The factors predicting ICP response to treatment and predicting death at 2 weeks were evaluated using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Increasing age and fewer hours of elevated ICP on Day 1 were found to be significant predictors (p = 0.001 and 0.0003, respectively) of a positive response to treatment. Response to ICP-lowering therapy (p = 0.03), younger age (p < 0.0001), fewer hours of elevated ICP (p < 0.0001), and absence of arterial hypotension on Day 1 (p = 0.001) significantly predicted reduced risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who responded to ICP-lowering treatment had a 64% lower risk of death at 2 weeks than those who did not respond after adjusting for factors that independently predict risk of death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21214327     DOI: 10.3171/2010.11.JNS101116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  23 in total

1.  Effects of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Outcome of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury; Results of a Historical Cohort Study.

Authors:  Abdolkarim Rahmanian; Ali Haghnegahdar; Abdolvahab Rahmanian; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2014-10

2.  Adding Salt to the Wounds: Perceived Risk of Hypertonic Saline for Cerebral Edema.

Authors:  David Z Rose; David A Decker; Karen P Wilson; Juan Ramos-Canseco
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  Severe Traumatic Brain Injury at a Tertiary Referral Center in Tanzania: Epidemiology and Adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines.

Authors:  Luke R Smart; Halinder S Mangat; Benson Issarow; Paul McClelland; Gerald Mayaya; Emmanuel Kanumba; Linda M Gerber; Xian Wu; Robert N Peck; Isidore Ngayomela; Malik Fakhar; Philip E Stieg; Roger Härtl
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  A Retrospective Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Outcomes in Adults after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury at Kaiser Permanente Trauma Centers.

Authors:  Kaveh Barami; Jessica Pemberton; Amit Banerjee; Jason London; William Bandy
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-05-19

5.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Yuxiao Ma; Li Xie; Xiang Wu; Jiyuan Hui; Jiyao Jiang; Guoyi Gao; Junfeng Feng
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.532

Review 6.  Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.

Authors:  Randall Chesnut; Walter Videtta; Paul Vespa; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  The value of intraoperative intracranial pressure monitoring for predicting re-operation using salvage decompressive craniectomy after craniotomy in patients with traumatic mass lesions.

Authors:  He-Xiang Zhao; Yi Liao; Ding Xu; Qiang-Ping Wang; Qi Gan; Chao You; Chao-Hua Yang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future.

Authors:  Angelos G Kolias; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  The relationship between serum sodium and intracranial pressure when using hypertonic saline to target mild hypernatremia in patients with head trauma.

Authors:  Diana L Wells; Joseph M Swanson; G Christopher Wood; Louis J Magnotti; Bradley A Boucher; Martin A Croce; Charles G Harrison; Michael S Muhlbauer; Timothy C Fabian
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Significance of intracranial pressure monitoring after early decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Deok-Ryeong Kim; Seung-Ho Yang; Jae-Hoon Sung; Sang-Won Lee; Byung-Chul Son
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.