Literature DB >> 21214309

Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.

Won-Ik Cho1, Ung-Kyu Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Differentiation between malignant and benign vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) is important but sometimes difficult, especially in elderly cancer patients. The authors investigated the findings of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT for the differentiation of VCFs.
METHODS: Between 2007 and 2008, the authors evaluated and treated 102 VCFs in 96 patients. The final diagnosis, based on biopsy results or clinical follow-up, was benign fracture in 67 lesions in 65 patients and malignant fracture in 35 lesions in 31 patients. Magnetic resonance images were obtained in all patients, and FDG-PET/CT was performed in 17 patients in the benign fracture group and 20 in the malignant fracture group. The prevalence of 3 significant MR imaging findings (posterior cortical bulging, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement) and the presence of radiotracer uptake on FDG-PET/CT were evaluated in the 2 groups. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET/CT was compared between the 2 groups, and diagnostic threshold value was sought to confirm malignancy. The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT was compared in the differentiation of malignant from benign VCFs.
RESULTS: Posterior cortical bulging was seen in 26 (74%) of 35 malignant lesions and 30 (45%) of 67 benign ones, epidural mass formation in 27 (77%) of the malignant lesions and 25% of the benign ones, and pedicle enhancement in 30 (91%) of the 33 malignant lesions and 18 (39%) of the 46 benign ones evaluated with Gd-enhanced MR imaging. These differences were statistically significant for each feature. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignancy were, respectively, 74% and 55% for posterior cortical bulging, 77% and 74% for epidural mass formation, and 90% and 61% for pedicle enhancement. Simultaneous occurrence of 3 significant features was found in 21 (64%) of the 33 malignant and 8 (17%) of the 46 benign lesions for which complete MR imaging data were available and showed sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 83%. The presence of radiotracer uptake on FDG-PET/CT was seen in all 20 (100%) of the 20 malignant lesions and 12 (71%) 17 of the benign lesions evaluated by FDG-PET/CT and showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 29%. There was a significant difference in mean (± SD) SUV(max) for the malignant (6.29 ± 3.50) and benign (2.38 ± 1.90) lesions (p < 0.001). The most reliable threshold for SUV(max) was found to be 4.25, which yielded a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 71%.
CONCLUSIONS: When MR imaging findings are equivocal, FDG-PET/CT can be considered as an adjunctive diagnostic method for differentiating malignant from benign VCFs. In comparison with MR imaging, FDG-PET/CT showed slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21214309     DOI: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  7 in total

1.  Role of Percutaneous Image Guided Biopsy in Spinal Lesions: Adequacy and Correlation with MRI Findings.

Authors:  Janardhana P Aithala
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  PET/CT-negative malignant spine tumor with pathologic fracture: A case report of malignant solitary bone plasmacytoma.

Authors:  Kang-Un Kim; Joon Hyuk Choi; Gun Woo Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  State-of-the-Art Imaging Techniques in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

Authors:  Tricia Kuah; Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Andrew Makmur; Shalini Nair; Junda Song; Jiong Hao Tan; Naresh Kumar; Swee Tian Quek; James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography combined in differentiating benign from malignant lesions contributing to vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Ashish Aggarwal; Pravin Salunke; Bala Raja Shekhar; Rajesh Chhabra; Paramjeet Singh; Anish Bhattacharya; Ravi Garg
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-05-28

Review 5.  Imaging of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Chandan J Das; Udismita Baruah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-05

6.  Differential diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xiaojiang He; Long Zhao; Xiuyu Guo; Liang Zhao; Jing Wu; Jingxiong Huang; Long Sun; Chengrong Xie; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  A novel MRI- and CT-based scoring system to differentiate malignant from osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Zi Li; Ming Guan; Dong Sun; Yong Xu; Feng Li; Wei Xiong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.