Literature DB >> 21213596

Effect of saliva processing on bacterial DNA extraction.

Kamila Polgárová1, Michal Behuliak, Peter Celec.   

Abstract

More than 700 bacterial species inhabit oral cavity of humans. Various oral diseases are related to changes in the structure of this complex community. Their pathogenesis can, thus, be better understood by study of oral microbial flora. As many bacteria are refractory to cultivation, molecular approaches based on PCR followed by downstream analysis are more suitable for community analysis than culture dependent methods. Effective DNA extraction from the sample matrix is a fundamental part of the pre-analytical phase but it can be influenced by processing of the starting material. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of saliva processing on DNA extraction using several non-commercial isolation procedures. Bacterial chromosomal DNA was extracted from three different sample matrices: fresh saliva, diluted saliva and pelleted saliva using four different extraction methods: phenol chloroform protocol, benzyl-chloride protocol, extraction with Chelex-100 and extraction with Triton X. Extraction from different saliva samples and the use of different extraction methods significantly affected the effectiveness of DNA extraction. The most suitable material for bacterial DNA extraction for molecular analysis is a fresh saliva sample. The most effective methods for isolating salivary DNA are the benzyl-chloride protocol and Chelex-100 extraction. Our results have implications for studies concentrating on salivary microbiome and its role in the pathogenesis of oral diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21213596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbiol        ISSN: 1121-7138            Impact factor:   2.479


  9 in total

1.  The PathoChip, a functional gene array for assessing pathogenic properties of diverse microbial communities.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Lee; Joy D van Nostrand; Qichao Tu; Zhenmei Lu; Lei Cheng; Tong Yuan; Ye Deng; Michelle Q Carter; Zhili He; Liyou Wu; Fang Yang; Jian Xu; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Genotyping performance between saliva and blood-derived genomic DNAs on the DMET array: a comparison.

Authors:  Yueshan Hu; Erik A Ehli; Kelly Nelson; Krista Bohlen; Christophina Lynch; Patty Huizenga; Julie Kittlelsrud; Timothy J Soundy; Gareth E Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Identification of different Escherichia coli pathotypes in north and north-west provinces of Iran.

Authors:  Seyedeh Tina Miri; Amir Dashti; Saeid Mostaan; Farzaneh Kazemi; Saeid Bouzari
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols.

Authors:  Thais Francini Garbieri; Daniel Thomas Brozoski; Thiago José Dionísio; Carlos Ferreira Santos; Lucimara Teixeira das Neves
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.

Authors:  Anna Vesty; Kristi Biswas; Michael W Taylor; Kim Gear; Richard G Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Oxidative stress in the oral cavity is driven by individual-specific bacterial communities.

Authors:  Mária Džunková; Daniel Martinez-Martinez; Roman Gardlík; Michal Behuliak; Katarína Janšáková; Nuria Jiménez; Jorge F Vázquez-Castellanos; Jose Manuel Martí; Giuseppe D'Auria; H M H N Bandara; Amparo Latorre; Peter Celec; Andrés Moya
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.290

7.  Fretibacterium sp. human oral taxon 360 is a novel biomarker for periodontitis screening in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Thatawee Khemwong; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Yuichi Ikeda; Takanori Matsuura; Takeaki Sudo; Chihiro Kano; Ryo Mikami; Yuichi Izumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Authors:  Monika Janíková; Július Hodosy; Peter Boor; Boris Klempa; Peter Celec
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  Amniotic fluid protein profiles of intraamniotic inflammatory response to Ureaplasma spp. and other bacteria.

Authors:  Marian Kacerovsky; Peter Celec; Barbora Vlkova; Kristin Skogstrand; David M Hougaard; Teresa Cobo; Bo Jacobsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.