Literature DB >> 21213566

Characterizing stiffness of human prostates using acoustic radiation force.

Liang Zhai1, John Madden, Wen-Chi Foo, Vladimir Mouraviev, Thomas J Polascik, Mark L Palmeri, Kathryn R Nightingale.   

Abstract

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging has been previously reported to portray normal anatomic structures and pathologies in ex vivo human prostates with good contrast and resolution. These findings were based on comparison with histological slides and McNeal's zonal anatomy. In ARFI images, the central zone (CZ) appears darker (smaller displacement) than other anatomic zones and prostate cancer (PCa) is darker than normal tissue in the peripheral zone (PZ). Since displacement amplitudes in ARFI images are determined by both the underlying tissue stiffness and the amplitude of acoustic radiation force that varies with acoustic attenuation, one question that arises is how the relative displacements in prostate ARFI images are related to the underlying prostatic tissue stiffness. In linear, isotropic elastic materials and in tissues that are relatively uniform in acoustic attenuation (e.g., liver), relative displacement in ARFI images has been shown to be correlated with underlying tissue stiffness. However, the prostate is known to be heterogeneous. Variations in acoustic attenuation of prostatic structures could confound the interpretation of ARFI images due to the associated variations in the applied acoustic radiation force. Therefore, in this study, co-registered three-dimensional (3D) ARFI datasets and quantitative shear wave elasticity imaging (SWEI) datasets were acquired in freshly-excised human prostates to investigate the relationship between displacement amplitudes in ARFI prostate images and the matched reconstructed shear moduli. The lateral time-to-peak (LTTP) algorithm was applied to the SWEI data to compute the shear-wave speed and reconstruct the shear moduli. Five types of prostatic tissue (PZ, CZ, transition zone (TZ) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), PCa and atrophy) were identified, whose shear moduli were quantified to be 4.1 +/- 0.8 kPa, 9.9 +/- 0.9 kPa, 4.8 +/- 0.6 kPa, 10.0 +/- 1.0 kPa and 8.0 kPa, respectively. Linear regression was performed to compare ARFI displacement amplitudes and the inverse of the corresponding reconstructed shear moduli at multiple depths. The results indicate an inverse relation between ARFI displacement amplitude and reconstructed shear modulus at all depths. These findings support the conclusion that ARFI prostate images portray underlying tissue stiffness variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21213566      PMCID: PMC3413332          DOI: 10.1177/016173461003200401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  34 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results.

Authors:  Kathryn Nightingale; Stephen McAleavey; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping.

Authors:  Jérémy Bercoff; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of the shear velocity of homogeneous biomaterials.

Authors:  Zhe Wu; Lawrence S Taylor; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Measuring the elastic modulus of small tissue samples.

Authors:  R Q Erkamp; P Wiggins; A R Skovoroda; S Y Emelianov; M O'Donnell
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging".

Authors:  K J Parker; S R Huang; R A Musulin; R M Lerner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Patterns of progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J E McNeal; D G Bostwick; R A Kindrachuk; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Sandrin; Bertrand Fourquet; Jean-Michel Hasquenoph; Sylvain Yon; Céline Fournier; Frédéric Mal; Christos Christidis; Marianne Ziol; Bruno Poulet; Farad Kazemi; Michel Beaugrand; Robert Palau
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of human prostates ex vivo.

Authors:  Liang Zhai; John Madden; Wen-Chi Foo; Mark L Palmeri; Vladimir Mouraviev; Thomas J Polascik; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  B-mode and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging of prostate zonal anatomy: comparison with 3T T2-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Zachary A Miller; Tyler J Glass; Kirema Garcia-Reyes; Rajan T Gupta; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Christopher Kauffman; Thomas J Polascik; Andrew Buck; Evan Kulbacki; John Madden; Samantha L Lipman; Ned C Rouze; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Post Hoc Analysis of Passive Cavitation Imaging for Classification of Histotripsy-Induced Liquefaction in Vitro.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Adam D Maxwell; Christy K Holland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of human prostates: initial in vivo demonstration.

Authors:  Liang Zhai; Thomas J Polascik; Wen-Chi Foo; Stephen Rosenzweig; Mark L Palmeri; John Madden; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Thomas J R Hughes; Pablo Dominguez-Frojan; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Behavior of tip-steerable needles in ex vivo and in vivo tissue.

Authors:  Ann Majewicz; Steven P Marra; Mark G van Vledder; MingDe Lin; Michael A Choti; Danny Y Song; Allison M Okamura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Tissue mimicking materials for the detection of prostate cancer using shear wave elastography: a validation study.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Zhihong Huang; Tomy Varghese; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Three-dimensional sheaf of ultrasound planes reconstruction (SOUPR) of ablated volumes.

Authors:  Atul Ingle; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.