Literature DB >> 21213193

Effects of motor intention on the perception of somatosensory events: a behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Stephen R Jackson1, Amy Parkinson, Sally L Pears, Se-Ho Nam.   

Abstract

The intention to execute a movement can modulate our perception of sensory events, and this modulation is observed ahead of both ocular and upper limb movements. However, theoretical accounts of these effects, and also the empirical data, are often contradictory. Accounts of "active touch", and the premotor theory of attention, have emphasized how movement intention leads to enhanced perceptual processing at the target of a movement, or on the to-be-moved effector. By contrast, recent theories of motor control emphasize how internal "forward" model (FM) estimates may be used to cancel or attenuate sensory signals that arise as a result of self-generated movements. We used behavioural and functional brain imaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI) to investigate how perception of a somatosensory stimulus differed according to whether it was delivered to a hand that was about to execute a reaching movement or the alternative, nonmoving, hand. The results of our study demonstrate that a somatosensory stimulus delivered to a hand that is being prepared for movement is perceived to have occurred later than when that same stimulus is delivered to a nonmoving hand. This result indicates that it takes longer for a tactile stimulus to be detected when it is delivered to a moving limb and may correspond to a change in perceptual threshold. Our behavioural results are paralleled by the results of our fMRI study that demonstrated that there were significantly reduced blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses within the parietal operculum and insula following somatosensory stimulation of the hand being prepared for movement, compared to when an identical stimulus was delivered to a nonmoving hand. These findings are consistent with the prediction of FM accounts of motor control that postulate that central sensory suppression of somatosensation accompanies self-generated limb movements, and with previous reports indicating that effects of sensory suppression are observed in higher order somatosensory regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21213193     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.529580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of self-touch in somatosensory and body representation disorders after stroke.

Authors:  H E van Stralen; M J E van Zandvoort; H C Dijkerman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception.

Authors:  Damian M Manzone; Luc Tremblay; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Modulation of somatosensory processing by action.

Authors:  Sukhwinder S Shergill; Thomas P White; Daniel W Joyce; Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Eusra Hassan; Andrew Curran; Johan Wessberg; Håkan Olausson; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Manipulable objects facilitate cross-modal integration in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tactile gating in a reaching and grasping task.

Authors:  Francisco L Colino; Gavin Buckingham; Darian T Cheng; Paul van Donkelaar; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-03-24

7.  Predicting the Multisensory Consequences of One's Own Action: BOLD Suppression in Auditory and Visual Cortices.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; Bianca M van Kemenade; B Ezgi Arikan; Katja Fiehler; Dirk T Leube; Laurence R Harris; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Motor commands induce time compression for tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Monica Gori; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  How spontaneous brain activity and narcissistic features shape social interaction.

Authors:  Andrea Scalabrini; Zirui Huang; Clara Mucci; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Antonio Ferretti; Andrea Fossati; Gian Luca Romani; Georg Northoff; Sjoerd J H Ebisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The role of visual processing on tactile suppression.

Authors:  Hanna Gertz; Katja Fiehler; Dimitris Voudouris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.