Vincenzo Denaro1, Alberto Di Martino. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continued innovation in surgery requires a knowledge and understanding of historical advances with a recognition of successes and failures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To identify these successes and failures, we selectively reviewed historical literature on cervical spine surgery with respect to the development of (1) surgical approaches, (2) management of degenerative disc disease, and (3) methods to treat segmental instability. METHODS: We performed a nonsystematic review using the keywords "cervical spine surgery" and "history" and "instrumentation" and "fusion" in combination with "anterior approach" and "posterior approach," with no limit regarding the year of publication. Used databases were PubMed and Google Scholar. In addition, the search was extended by screening the reference list of all articles. RESULTS: Innovative surgical approaches allowed direct access to symptomatic areas of the cervical spine. Over the years, we observed a trend from posterior to anterior surgical techniques. Management of the degenerative spine has evolved from decompressive surgery alone to the direct removal of the cause of neural impingement. Internal fixation of actual or potential spinal instability and the associated instrumentation have continuously evolved to allow more reliable fusion. More recently, surgeons have developed the basis for nonfusion surgical techniques and implants. CONCLUSIONS: The most important advances appear to be (1) recognition of the need to directly address the causes of symptoms, (2) proper decompression of neural structures, and (3) more reliable fusion of unstable symptomatic segments.
BACKGROUND: Continued innovation in surgery requires a knowledge and understanding of historical advances with a recognition of successes and failures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To identify these successes and failures, we selectively reviewed historical literature on cervical spine surgery with respect to the development of (1) surgical approaches, (2) management of degenerative disc disease, and (3) methods to treat segmental instability. METHODS: We performed a nonsystematic review using the keywords "cervical spine surgery" and "history" and "instrumentation" and "fusion" in combination with "anterior approach" and "posterior approach," with no limit regarding the year of publication. Used databases were PubMed and Google Scholar. In addition, the search was extended by screening the reference list of all articles. RESULTS: Innovative surgical approaches allowed direct access to symptomatic areas of the cervical spine. Over the years, we observed a trend from posterior to anterior surgical techniques. Management of the degenerative spine has evolved from decompressive surgery alone to the direct removal of the cause of neural impingement. Internal fixation of actual or potential spinal instability and the associated instrumentation have continuously evolved to allow more reliable fusion. More recently, surgeons have developed the basis for nonfusion surgical techniques and implants. CONCLUSIONS: The most important advances appear to be (1) recognition of the need to directly address the causes of symptoms, (2) proper decompression of neural structures, and (3) more reliable fusion of unstable symptomatic segments.
Authors: Lawrence J Oh; Sam Ong; Sherief Ghozy; Adam A Dmytriw; Jeffrey Zuccato; Ralph Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Mahmoud Dibas; Harrison Faulkner Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2020-09
Authors: Ronald H M A Bartels; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.134