Literature DB >> 21213051

Quantification of fractional flow reserve based on angiographic image data.

Jerry T Wong1, Huy Le, William M Suh, David A Chalyan, Toufan Mehraien, Morton J Kern, Ghassan S Kassab, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

Coronary angiography provides excellent visualization of coronary arteries, but has limitations in assessing the clinical significance of a coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to be reliable in discerning stenoses responsible for inducible ischemia. The purpose of this study is to validate a technique for FFR quantification using angiographic image data. The study was carried out on 10 anesthetized, closed-chest swine using angioplasty balloon catheters to produce partial occlusion. Angiography based FFR was calculated from an angiographically measured ratio of coronary blood flow to arterial lumen volume. Pressure-based FFR was measured from a ratio of distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure. Pressure-wire measurements of FFR (FFR( P )) correlated linearly with angiographic volume-derived measurements of FFR (FFR( V )) according to the equation: FFR( P ) = 0.41 FFR( V ) + 0.52 (P-value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient and standard error of estimate were 0.85 and 0.07, respectively. This is the first study to provide an angiographic method to quantify FFR in swine. Angiographic FFR can potentially provide an assessment of the physiological severity of a coronary stenosis during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization without a need to cross a stenosis with a pressure-wire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21213051      PMCID: PMC3094747          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9767-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  38 in total

1.  Pulsatile coronary flow determination by digital angiography.

Authors:  H Marinus; B Buis; A van Benthem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek; Julien I E Hoffman; Maria Siebes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Effect of compliance and hematocrit on wall shear stress in a model of the entire coronary arterial tree.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-06-18

4.  Absolute volumetric coronary blood flow measurement with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  S Molloi; G Bednarz; J Tang; Y Zhou; T Mathur
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-06

5.  Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement.

Authors:  G J Bech; B De Bruyne; H J Bonnier; J Bartunek; W Wijns; K Peels; G R Heyndrickx; J J Koolen; N H Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry.

Authors:  N H Pijls; G J Uijen; A Hoevelaken; T Arts; W R Aengevaeren; H S Bos; J H Fast; K L van Leeuwen; T van der Werf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Regional blood flow analysis and its relationship with arterial branch lengths and lumen volume in the coronary arterial tree.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Jerry T Wong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans.

Authors:  P Chareonthaitawee; P A Kaufmann; O Rimoldi; P G Camici
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators.

Authors:  E D Folland; R A Vogel; P Hartigan; E R Bates; G J Beauman; T Fortin; C Boucher; A F Parisi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jenny Susana Choy; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-03-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantification of absolute coronary flow reserve and relative fractional flow reserve in a swine animal model using angiographic image data.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Assessment of coronary microcirculation in a swine animal model.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  An angiographic technique for coronary fractional flow reserve measurement: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Shigeho Takarada; Zhang Zhang; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

6.  Signaling and structures underpinning conducted vasodilation in human and porcine intramyocardial coronary arteries.

Authors:  Kim A Dora; JinHeng Lin; Lyudmyla Borysova; Timea Beleznai; Michael Taggart; Raimondo Ascione; Christopher Garland
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.