Literature DB >> 21212983

Reduced activity of moxidectin and ivermectin on small strongyles in young horses on a farm (BC) in Central Kentucky in two field tests with notes on variable counts of eggs per gram of feces (EPGs).

Eugene T Lyons1, Sharon C Tolliver, Sandra S Collins.   

Abstract

Two field tests (A and B) were conducted in Thoroughbred weanlings born in 2008 and 2009 on a farm (BC) in Central Kentucky. The purpose was to determine the current efficacy of moxidectin (MOX) and ivermectin (IVM) on small strongyles by pre- and posttreatment counts of eggs per gram of feces (EPGs) in this geographical area. In previous parasite studies in horses on this farm and in horses on numerous other farms in this area, cultures of feces indicated the strongyle larvae were all small strongyles. Therefore, the strongyle eggs in the EPG counts are considered small strongyles. Designation of the location of the horses in the current study is by barn number. However, the horses were kept on pastures except when gotten up in the specific barns for treatment and collection of feces. The number of horses for study A (2008-2009) was 40 in a total of ten barns (four in each location) and that for study B (2009-2010) was 49 in a total of nine barns (four each in six locations and seven to nine each in three locations). The nine barns for the study-B horses were the same ones used for the study-A horses; the tenth barn for study A was not used for study B. The number of horses treated was 20 with MOX and 20 with IVM in study A and 24 with MOX and 25 with IVM in study B. Drugs given to horses in barns in study B were switched from those used in barns in study A. That is, horses in barns where MOX was used in study A were given IVM and vice versa for those in study B. Study-A horses in some of the barns had unexplained either negative or delayed return of EPG counts after treatment with either drug, compared to horses in other barns. No reason for inconsistencies could be determined. Study B was initiated to compare results with study-A horses, relative to their location in the same barns. Study- B horses, contrary to horses in study A, had mostly consistent results between barns. Most of the MOX- and IVM-treated horses in study B and some in study A had strongyle EPG counts returning almost twice as quickly as when these compounds were first marketed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212983     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-010-2225-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  10 in total

1.  Management of drug-resistant cyathostominosis on a breeding farm in central North Carolina.

Authors:  D Little; J R Flowers; B H Hammerberg; S Y Gardner
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  CRITICAL TESTS OF THIABENDAZOLE AS AN ANTHELMINTIC IN THE HORSE.

Authors:  J H DRUDGE; J SZANTO; Z N WYANT; G ELAM
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms.

Authors:  G von Samson-Himmelstjerna; B Fritzen; J Demeler; S Schürmann; K Rohn; T Schnieder; C Epe
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses.

Authors:  M B Molento; J Antunes; R N Bentes; G C Coles
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Ivermectin resistance in a horse in Australia.

Authors:  C L Edward; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Shortened strongyle-type egg reappearance periods in naturally infected horses treated with moxidectin and failure of a larvicidal dose of fenbendazole to reduce fecal egg counts.

Authors:  M G Rossano; A R Smith; E T Lyons
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Field tests demonstrating reduced activity of ivermectin and moxidectin against small strongyles in horses on 14 farms in Central Kentucky in 2007-2009.

Authors:  Eugene T Lyons; Sharon C Tolliver; Sandra S Collins; Mariana Ionita; Tetiana A Kuzmina; Mary Rossano
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky.

Authors:  E T Lyons; S C Tolliver; M Ionita; A Lewellen; S S Collins
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Comparison of the reappearance of strongyle eggs on foals, yearlings and adult horses after treatment with ivermectin or pyrantel.

Authors:  J H Boersema; M Eysker; J Maas; W M van der Aar
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.320

10.  Probable reason why small strongyle EPG counts are returning "early" after ivermectin treatment of horses on a farm in Central Kentucky.

Authors:  E T Lyons; S C Tolliver; S S Collins
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.289

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Investigation of strongyle EPG values in horse mares relative to known age, number positive, and level of egg shedding in field studies on 26 farms in Central Kentucky (2010-2011).

Authors:  E T Lyons; S C Tolliver; T A Kuzmina
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment.

Authors:  Stephanie Schneider; Kurt Pfister; Anne M Becher; Miriam C Scheuerle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Anthelmintics efficacy against intestinal strongyles in horses of Sardinia, Italy.

Authors:  G Sanna; A P Pipia; C Tamponi; R Manca; A Varcasia; D Traversa; A Scala
Journal:  Parasite Epidemiol Control       Date:  2016-03-08

4.  Outbreak of acute larval cyathostominosis - A "perfect storm" of inflammation and dysbiosis.

Authors:  Nicola Walshe; Grace Mulcahy; Fiona Crispie; Raul Cabrera-Rubio; Paul Cotter; Hanne Jahns; Vivienne Duggan
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.