Literature DB >> 21212448

Impact of an electronic health record on follow-up time for markedly elevated serum potassium results.

Jenny J Lin1, Carlton Moore.   

Abstract

Follow-up of abnormal ambulatory laboratory results is often suboptimal. The impact of an ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) on follow-up of markedly elevated blood potassium (K( +)) results was investigated via a retrospective medical record review-before and after EHR implementation-of patients at an adult primary care practice who had a nonhemolyzed K(+) ≥ 6.0 mEq/L. In all, 188 patients in the pre-EHR group and 30 in the EHR group satisfied inclusion criteria. The mean K(+) for the 2 groups was 6.3 mEq/L. The EHR group had 4.5 times the odds (95% confidence interval = 1.3-15.8) of having their episodes of hyperkalemia followed up within 4 days. Patients in the EHR group were also more likely to have their blood K(+) rechecked within 4 days (63.3% vs 43.6%; P = .044). An ambulatory EHR with a results management system improves documentation and time to follow-up for patients with markedly abnormal lab results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212448     DOI: 10.1177/1062860610385333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  4 in total

1.  Variation in interoperability across clinical laboratories nationwide.

Authors:  Vaishali Patel; Lauren McNamara; Prashila Dullabh; Megan E Sawchuk; Matthew Swain
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Effects of laboratory data exchange in the care of patients with HIV.

Authors:  Douglas S Bell; Laral Cima; Danielle S Seiden; Terry T Nakazono; Marcia S Alcouloumre; William E Cunningham
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Factors influencing digital review of pathology test results in an inpatient setting: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Robert Challen; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova; Tom Edwards; Luke Gompels; Mark Dayer; Martin Pitt; Leon Danon
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.