Literature DB >> 2121179

Women with urinary incontinence: self-perceived worries and general practitioners' knowledge of problem.

T L Lagro-Janssen1, A J Smits, C Van Weel.   

Abstract

In the context of a large scale survey of health problems in women aged 50 to 65 years, a study was undertaken on the effects of incontinence on daily life. For this purpose 1442 women randomly selected from the practice files of 75 general practitioners in the eastern part of the Netherlands were interviewed at home (response rate 60%). In cases of moderate or severe incontinence the general practitioner of the woman concerned was asked whether this problem had been diagnosed in general practice. Incontinence was reported in 22.5% of the women. Overall, 77.8% of the women did not feel worried about it and 75.4% did not feel restricted in their activities; even for women with severe incontinence (daily frequency and needing protective pads) only 15.6% experienced much worry and 15.7% much restriction. About a third of the women with incontinence (32.0%) had been identified by their general practitioner. The greater the worries and restrictions owing to incontinence, the greater the chance that the incontinence was known to the general practitioner concerned. Only a small minority of the women who felt severely restricted were not identified by their general practitioner. There was a positive relation between recognized incontinence and a history of hysterectomy. This study contradicts the image of the incontinent woman as isolated and helpless; most women in this study seemed able to cope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2121179      PMCID: PMC1371311     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  16 in total

1.  Social support as coping assistance.

Authors:  P A Thoits
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-08

Review 2.  The prevalence and scope of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  E A Mohide
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.076

3.  Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04

4.  A psychiatric study of women with urgency and urgency incontinence.

Authors:  R J Hafner; S L Stanton; J Guy
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1977-06

5.  Micturition and the mind: psychological factors in the aetiology and treatment of urinary symptoms in women.

Authors:  A J Macaulay; R S Stern; D M Holmes; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-02-28

6.  Diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence in general practice.

Authors:  J V Jolleys
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-07

7.  The prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  J W Yarnell; G J Voyle; C J Richards; T P Stephenson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Prevalence of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  T M Thomas; K R Plymat; J Blannin; T W Meade
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-08

9.  The frequency of disorders of the lower urinary tract, urinary incontinence in particular, as evaluated by a questionnaire survey in a gynecological health control population.

Authors:  S Iosif; L Henriksson; U Ulmsten
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Psychological features of women with idiopathic detrusor instability.

Authors:  R M Freeman; F M McPherson; K Baxby
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  14 in total

1.  Death notification and bereavement in general practice: optimizing the quality of care.

Authors:  Y H Carter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Urinary incontinence in older people living in the community: examining help-seeking behaviour.

Authors:  Doreth Teunissen; Chris van Weel; Toine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Artur Rogowski; Przemyslaw Bienkowski; Jerzy Samochowiec; Pawel Mierzejewski; Malgorzata Jerzak; Wlodzimierz Baranowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Urinary incontinence in women--a conundrum.

Authors:  T C O'Dowd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Urinary incontinence in the community.

Authors:  G J Jarvis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

6.  Cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ceren Orhan; Serap Özgül; Emine Baran; Esra Üzelpasacı; Gülbala Nakip; Gamze Nalan Çinar; Mehmet Sinan Beksaç; Türkan Akbayrak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Inpatient bladder retraining: is it beneficial on its own?

Authors:  Amitabha Majumdar; Ismail Hassan; Sepeedeh Saleh; Philip Toozs-Hobson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Urinary incontinence in women: its prevalence and its management in a health promotion clinic.

Authors:  G L Harrison; D S Memel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  General practitioners and women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  M Grealish; T C O'Dowd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  H Sandvik; S Hunskaar; A Seim; R Hermstad; A Vanvik; H Bratt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.