Literature DB >> 21211497

Screenee perception and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Elena Pizzo1, Alessandro Pezzoli, Reinhold Stockbrugger, Enrico Bracci, Emidia Vagnoni, Sergio Gullini.   

Abstract

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has become established to varying degrees in several Western countries for the past 30 years. Because of its effectiveness, screening has been adopted or is planned in a number of other countries. In most countries, the screening method (e.g., fecal occult blood test [FOBT], sigmoidoscopy) is followed by colonoscopy, for verification. In other countries (e.g., United States, Germany), colonoscopy is the preferred first-line investigation method. However, because colonoscopy is considered to be invasive, might be poorly tolerated, and can be associated with complications, the idea of adopting colonoscopy as the primary screening method suffers. Negative effects of screening methods can reduce participation in programs and thereby negate the desired effect on individual and societal health. At present, there is no generally accepted method either to assess the perception and satisfaction of patients screened or the outcome of the screening procedures in CRC. In this review, we discuss the past development and present availability of instruments to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the scarce studies in which such instruments have been used in screening campaigns, and the findings. We suggest the creation of a specific instrument for the assessment of HRQoL in CRC screening. Copyright
© 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21211497     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  10 in total

1.  An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Deborah A Marshall; John K Marshall; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Quality of life, religious attitude and cancer coping in a sample of Iranian patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad-Kazem Atef-Vahid; Mehdi Nasr-Esfahani; Mohsen Saberi Esfeedvajani; Homayoon Naji-Isfahani; Mohammad Reza Shojaei; Yasavoli M Masoumeh; S Ashrafodin Goushegir
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.

Authors:  A Bobridge; P Bampton; S Cole; H Lewis; G Young
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Tone Lise Åvitsland; Alvilde Maria Ossum; Thomas de Lange; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants vs individuals not invited.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Linn Bernklev; Badboni El-Safadi; Geir Hoff; Thomas de Lange; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Why Do Some People Choose Opportunistic Rather Than Organized Cancer Screening? The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.

Authors:  Myung-Il Hahm; Hsueh-Fen Chen; Thaddeus Miller; Liam O'Neill; Hoo-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.

Authors:  A Kapidzic; I J Korfage; L van Dam; A H C van Roon; J C I Y Reijerink; A G Zauber; M van Ballegooijen; E J Kuipers; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Application of WHOQOL-BREF in Measuring Quality of Life in Health-Care Staff.

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Leila Moosavi Jahromi; Esmail Zarei; Azizallah Dehghan
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-07

9.  Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Markham Risica; Natalie H Matthews; Laura Dionne; Jennifer Mello; Laura K Ferris; Melissa Saul; Alan C Geller; Francis Solano; John M Kirkwood; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-17

10.  Health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: are there differences between sporadic and hereditary patients?

Authors:  Allison M Burton-Chase; Wendy M Parker; Kirsten M Donato; Shannon McCormick; Ellen R Gritz; Christopher I Amos; Karen H Lu; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Y Nancy You; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.