Literature DB >> 21211487

The economic burden of Medicare-eligible patients by multiple sclerosis type.

Daniel M Gilden1, Joanna Kubisiak, Arthur S Zbrozek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the global rate of multiple sclerosis (MS) is low, a few studies have documented high costs. Costs are highly variable depending on MS stage. This study was designed to assess the economic burden of Medicare-eligible patients by MS type in the United States using a claims-based classification algorithm to examine cost variation by disease stage.
METHODS: A sample of 2003 to 2006 Medicare patients was selected. Cases were classified as pre-existing progressive MS or pre-existing relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); the latter were further subdivided into relapsing, remitting, or stable.
RESULTS: The sample had 5044 MS subjects, of whom 34.4% had prevalent progressive MS and 65.6% had prevalent RRMS. There were many chronic, comorbid conditions. The mean all-cause Medicare expenditures (not including self-administered medications) per person-year for MS in 2006 were $23,630 for prevalent progressive patients and $5887 for prevalent RRMS patients. Within the RRMS type, Medicare expenditures per person per month in 2006 were $1418 for relapsing patients, $608 for remitting patients, and $331 for stable patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial cost advantages to Medicare for keeping RRMS patients in a stable health state and in keeping them from advancing in disability severity. The overall cost advantage would be diminished by the large cost burden of comorbidity, which would likely remain fixed with improved MS therapies.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21211487     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost of Illness of Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olivia Ernstsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Kristina Alexanderson; Petter Tinghög; Emilie Friberg; Anders Norlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cost per response analysis of repository corticotropin injection versus other alternative treatments for acute exacerbations of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  George J Wan; Ishveen Chopra; John Niewoehner; Samuel F Hunter
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Experiences of hospitalization in patients with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Somayeh Ghafari; Masoud Fallahi-Khoshknab; Kian Norouzi; Eisa Mohamadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-05

4.  Using U.S. Medicare records to evaluate the indirect health effects on spouses: a case study in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Authors:  Daniel M Gilden; Joanna M Kubisiak; Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski; Daniel E Ball; Lee Bowman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®).

Authors:  Laura S Gold; Kangho Suh; Patricia B Schepman; Kavitha Damal; Ryan N Hansen
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.