OBJECTIVE: To assess time trends in the contribution of processed foods to food purchases made by Brazilian households and to explore the potential impact on the overall quality of the diet. DESIGN: Application of a new classification of foodstuffs based on extent and purpose of food processing to data collected by comparable probabilistic household budget surveys. The classification assigns foodstuffs to the following groups: unprocessed/minimally processed foods (Group 1); processed culinary ingredients (Group 2); or ultra-processed ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat food products (Group 3). SETTING: Eleven metropolitan areas of Brazil. SUBJECTS: Households; n 13,611 in 1987-8, n 16,014 in 1995-5 and n 13,848 in 2002-3. RESULTS: Over the last three decades, the household consumption of Group 1 and Group 2 foods has been steadily replaced by consumption of Group 3 ultra-processed food products, both overall and in lower- and upper-income groups. In the 2002-3 survey, Group 3 items represented more than one-quarter of total energy (more than one-third for higher-income households). The overall nutrient profile of Group 3 items, compared with that of Group 1 and Group 2 items, revealed more added sugar, more saturated fat, more sodium, less fibre and much higher energy density. CONCLUSIONS: The high energy density and the unfavourable nutrition profiling of Group 3 food products, and also their potential harmful effects on eating and drinking behaviours, indicate that governments and health authorities should use all possible methods, including legislation and statutory regulation, to halt and reverse the replacement of minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients by ultra-processed food products.
OBJECTIVE: To assess time trends in the contribution of processed foods to food purchases made by Brazilian households and to explore the potential impact on the overall quality of the diet. DESIGN: Application of a new classification of foodstuffs based on extent and purpose of food processing to data collected by comparable probabilistic household budget surveys. The classification assigns foodstuffs to the following groups: unprocessed/minimally processed foods (Group 1); processed culinary ingredients (Group 2); or ultra-processed ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat food products (Group 3). SETTING: Eleven metropolitan areas of Brazil. SUBJECTS: Households; n 13,611 in 1987-8, n 16,014 in 1995-5 and n 13,848 in 2002-3. RESULTS: Over the last three decades, the household consumption of Group 1 and Group 2 foods has been steadily replaced by consumption of Group 3 ultra-processed food products, both overall and in lower- and upper-income groups. In the 2002-3 survey, Group 3 items represented more than one-quarter of total energy (more than one-third for higher-income households). The overall nutrient profile of Group 3 items, compared with that of Group 1 and Group 2 items, revealed more added sugar, more saturated fat, more sodium, less fibre and much higher energy density. CONCLUSIONS: The high energy density and the unfavourable nutrition profiling of Group 3 food products, and also their potential harmful effects on eating and drinking behaviours, indicate that governments and health authorities should use all possible methods, including legislation and statutory regulation, to halt and reverse the replacement of minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients by ultra-processed food products.
Authors: Vanessa M Oddo; Noel T Mueller; Keshia M Pollack; Pamela J Surkan; Sara N Bleich; Jessica C Jones-Smith Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kenia Pereira Bispo; Letícia de Oliveira Rodrigues; Érica da Silva Soares de Souza; Daniela Mucci; Maria das Graças Tavares do Carmo; Kelse Tibau de Albuquerque; Fatima Lucia de Carvalho Sardinha Journal: J Physiol Sci Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Rosangela A Pereira; Amanda M Souza; Kiyah J Duffey; Rosely Sichieri; Barry M Popkin Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.022