Boris Schiffer1, Corinne Vonlaufen. 1. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany Department of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. boris.schiffer@uni-due.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is some evidence that child molesters show neuropsychological abnormalities which might reflect specific structural and/or functional brain alterations, but there are also inconsistencies in the existing findings which need to be clarified. Most of the different outcomes can either be explained by the fact that different types of child molesters were examined or by not having accounted for basically confounding factors such as age, education/intelligence, or criminality. AIM: The present study therefore sought to determine whether pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters, compared to relevant control groups, show different profiles of executive dysfunction when accounting for potentially confounding factors. METHODS: The performance of 30 child molesters (15 pedophilic and 15 nonpedophilic) and 33 age- and education-matched controls (16 nonsexual offenders and 17 healthy controls) was assessed regarding several neuropsychological functions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on different neurocognitive tests and semistructured diagnostical interviews. RESULTS: Results indicate that pedophilic child molesters exhibited less performance deficits in cognitive functioning than nonpedophilic child molesters. Compared to healthy controls and nonsexual offenders, the pedophilic child molesters only showed executive dysfunction concerning response inhibition, whereas the nonpedophilic child molesters revealed more severe dysfunction, especially on tasks associated with cognitive flexibility and verbal memory. CONCLUSIONS: These results enhance our knowledge about executive dysfunction associated with criminality and/or pedophilia, as they suggest different profiles of impairment between groups. In summary, data suggest that nonpedophilic child molesters showed more severe cognitive deficits than pedophilic child molesters. However, as response inhibition is associated with prefrontal (i.e., orbitofrontal) functioning, the deficits observed in both child molester groups indicate dysfunction in the orbitofrontal cortex. This has to be further examined with functional imaging approaches in larger samples and a full-factorial approach which allows for a clear distinction between criminality and pedophilia in a factorial manner.
INTRODUCTION: There is some evidence that child molesters show neuropsychological abnormalities which might reflect specific structural and/or functional brain alterations, but there are also inconsistencies in the existing findings which need to be clarified. Most of the different outcomes can either be explained by the fact that different types of child molesters were examined or by not having accounted for basically confounding factors such as age, education/intelligence, or criminality. AIM: The present study therefore sought to determine whether pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters, compared to relevant control groups, show different profiles of executive dysfunction when accounting for potentially confounding factors. METHODS: The performance of 30 child molesters (15 pedophilic and 15 nonpedophilic) and 33 age- and education-matched controls (16 nonsexual offenders and 17 healthy controls) was assessed regarding several neuropsychological functions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on different neurocognitive tests and semistructured diagnostical interviews. RESULTS: Results indicate that pedophilic child molesters exhibited less performance deficits in cognitive functioning than nonpedophilic child molesters. Compared to healthy controls and nonsexual offenders, the pedophilic child molesters only showed executive dysfunction concerning response inhibition, whereas the nonpedophilic child molesters revealed more severe dysfunction, especially on tasks associated with cognitive flexibility and verbal memory. CONCLUSIONS: These results enhance our knowledge about executive dysfunction associated with criminality and/or pedophilia, as they suggest different profiles of impairment between groups. In summary, data suggest that nonpedophilic child molesters showed more severe cognitive deficits than pedophilic child molesters. However, as response inhibition is associated with prefrontal (i.e., orbitofrontal) functioning, the deficits observed in both child molester groups indicate dysfunction in the orbitofrontal cortex. This has to be further examined with functional imaging approaches in larger samples and a full-factorial approach which allows for a clear distinction between criminality and pedophilia in a factorial manner.
Authors: Timm B Poeppl; Simon B Eickhoff; Peter T Fox; Angela R Laird; Rainer Rupprecht; Berthold Langguth; Danilo Bzdok Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Christian Kärgel; Claudia Massau; Simone Weiß; Martin Walter; Viola Borchardt; Tillmann H C Krueger; Gilian Tenbergen; Jonas Kneer; Matthias Wittfoth; Alexander Pohl; Hannah Gerwinn; Jorge Ponseti; Till Amelung; Klaus M Beier; Sebastian Mohnke; Henrik Walter; Boris Schiffer Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gilian Tenbergen; Matthias Wittfoth; Helge Frieling; Jorge Ponseti; Martin Walter; Henrik Walter; Klaus M Beier; Boris Schiffer; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Kirsten Jordan; Peter Fromberger; Jakob von Herder; Henrike Steinkrauss; Rebekka Nemetschek; Joachim Witzel; Jürgen L Müller Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jorge Ponseti; Daniel Bruhn; Julia Nolting; Hannah Gerwinn; Alexander Pohl; Aglaja Stirn; Oliver Granert; Helmut Laufs; Günther Deuschl; Stephan Wolff; Olav Jansen; Hartwig Siebner; Peer Briken; Sebastian Mohnke; Till Amelung; Jonas Kneer; Boris Schiffer; Henrik Walter; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Inka Ristow; Jens Foell; Christian Kärgel; Viola Borchardt; Shijia Li; Dominik Denzel; Joachim Witzel; Krasimira Drumkova; Klaus Beier; Tillmann H C Kruger; Jorge Ponseti; Boris Schiffer; Kolja Schiltz; Henrik Walter; Martin Walter Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 4.881