OBJECTIVE: We used genetic variants that are robustly associated with adiposity to examine the causal association of adiposity with psychological distress. METHODS: We examined the association of adiposity with psychological distress in a large (N = 53,221) general population cohort of 20- to 99-year-old adults from Copenhagen, Denmark. Psychological distress was assessed using four questions that asked about: feeling stressed; not accomplishing very much; wanting to give up; and regular use of antidepressants/sedatives. We used the genetic loci FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 as instrumental variables for adiposity quantified by body mass index (BMI) and waist to hip ratio (WHR). RESULTS: In conventional multivariable analyses, BMI and WHR were positively associated with distress. For example, the odds ratio of reporting not accomplishing for each additional standard deviation increase for BMI was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.13) and for WHR was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.13) in the fully adjusted analyses. In contrast, instrumental variable analyses showed an inverse association of adiposity on distress; corresponding odds ratio in instrumental variable analyses was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.89) for BMI and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.94) for WHR (P-values for difference between the two approaches both = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The inverse associations of adiposity and psychological distress when genetic variants are used as instrumental variables could be explained by biological pathways linking adiposity and distress. The positive associations of adiposity with distress in multivariable analyses might be explained by residual confounding or reverse causality.
OBJECTIVE: We used genetic variants that are robustly associated with adiposity to examine the causal association of adiposity with psychological distress. METHODS: We examined the association of adiposity with psychological distress in a large (N = 53,221) general population cohort of 20- to 99-year-old adults from Copenhagen, Denmark. Psychological distress was assessed using four questions that asked about: feeling stressed; not accomplishing very much; wanting to give up; and regular use of antidepressants/sedatives. We used the genetic loci FTOrs9939609 and MC4Rrs17782313 as instrumental variables for adiposity quantified by body mass index (BMI) and waist to hip ratio (WHR). RESULTS: In conventional multivariable analyses, BMI and WHR were positively associated with distress. For example, the odds ratio of reporting not accomplishing for each additional standard deviation increase for BMI was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.13) and for WHR was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.13) in the fully adjusted analyses. In contrast, instrumental variable analyses showed an inverse association of adiposity on distress; corresponding odds ratio in instrumental variable analyses was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.89) for BMI and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.94) for WHR (P-values for difference between the two approaches both = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The inverse associations of adiposity and psychological distress when genetic variants are used as instrumental variables could be explained by biological pathways linking adiposity and distress. The positive associations of adiposity with distress in multivariable analyses might be explained by residual confounding or reverse causality.
Authors: S Walter; M M Glymour; K Koenen; L Liang; E J Tchetgen Tchetgen; M Cornelis; S-C Chang; M Rewak; E Rimm; I Kawachi; L D Kubzansky Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Karen K Ryan; Joram D Mul; Christoffer Clemmensen; Ann E Egan; Denovan P Begg; Kristen Halcomb; Randy J Seeley; James P Herman; Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Stefan Walter; Laura D Kubzansky; Karestan C Koenen; Liming Liang; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Shun-Chiao Chang; Eric Rimm; Ichiro Kawachi; M Maria Glymour Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: A Pan; Q Sun; S Czernichow; M Kivimaki; O I Okereke; M Lucas; J E Manson; A Ascherio; F B Hu Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.095