Literature DB >> 21210871

A review of one-to-one dietetic obesity management in adults.

C Grace1.   

Abstract

This review outlines the evidence and proposed professional consensus on one-to-one dietetic weight management for UK adults. New opportunities and challenges are arising for dietitians as the status afforded to obesity management increases. It is timely therefore to reflect on dietetic practice and consider the associated evidence. Despite a long standing history of working in obesity, little is known about the specific nature of UK dietetic practice, making it difficult to determine whether services are evolving and meeting recommended guidelines. It is essential that an evaluation of dietetic practice is undertaken and, importantly, that findings are published and disseminated to the profession. Assessment is the foundation of good weight management. However, given the complexity of obesity, the practice of completing both an assessment and instigating treatment during a brief consultation may not be feasible. The practitioner's interpersonal skills are central to treatment outcomes and merit regular review and comprehensive training. The ability to express empathy is a key skill, which is particularly important given the widespread weight bias in healthcare. Evidence supports multicomponent interventions combining diet, physical activity and behaviour modification. Following stabilisation of eating, as well as improvements to diet quality, the evidence supports the 600-kcal deficit, meal replacements and, in carefully selected individuals, very low energy diets. A weight maintenance component to management is linked with reduced weight regain, although the optimal frequency, duration and content of sessions are unclear. For many services, this higher intensity provision will likely require a multidisciplinary, multi-agency approach.
© 2011 The Author. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. © 2011 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21210871     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  6 in total

1.  Weight related health status of patients treated by dietitians in primary care practice: first results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Govers; Jacob C Seidell; Marjolein Visser; Ingeborg A Brouwer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Description and preliminary results from a structured specialist behavioural weight management group intervention: Specialist Lifestyle Management (SLiM) programme.

Authors:  Adrian Brown; Amy Gouldstone; Emily Fox; Annmarie Field; Wendy Todd; Jayadave Shakher; Srikanth Bellary; Ming Ming Teh; Muhammad Azam; Reggie John; Alison Jagielski; Teresa Arora; G Neil Thomas; Shahrad Taheri
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Developing dimensions for a multicomponent multidisciplinary approach to obesity management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anita J Cochrane; Bob Dick; Neil A King; Andrew P Hills; David J Kavanagh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Facilitators and barriers to a dietitian-implemented blended care weight-loss intervention (SMARTsize): a qualitative study.

Authors:  W H Heideman; F C Rongen; C Bolleurs; E Govers; W Kroeze; I H M Steenhuis
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.089

5.  Gastric electrical stimulation for the treatment of obesity: from entrainment to bezoars-a functional review.

Authors:  Martin P Mintchev
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07

6.  Low-energy total diet replacement intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity treated with insulin: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Adrian Brown; Anne Dornhorst; Barbara McGowan; Omar Omar; Anthony R Leeds; Shahrad Taheri; Gary S Frost
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.