Literature DB >> 21210769

An augmented probit model for missing predictable covariates in quantal bioassay with small sample size.

Dean Follmann1, Martha Nason.   

Abstract

Quantal bioassay experiments relate the amount or potency of some compound; for example, poison, antibody, or drug to a binary outcome such as death or infection in animals. For infectious diseases, probit regression is commonly used for inference and a key measure of potency is given by the ID(P) , the amount that results in P% of the animals being infected. In some experiments, a validation set may be used where both direct and proxy measures of the dose are available on a subset of animals with the proxy being available on all. The proxy variable can be viewed as a messy reflection of the direct variable, leading to an errors-in-variables problem. We develop a model for the validation set and use a constrained seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to obtain the distribution of the direct measure conditional on the proxy. We use the conditional distribution to derive a pseudo-likelihood based on probit regression and use the parametric bootstrap for statistical inference. We re-evaluate an old experiment in 21 monkeys where neutralizing antibodies (nABs) to HIV were measured using an old (proxy) assay in all monkeys and with a new (direct) assay in a validation set of 11 who had sufficient stored plasma. Using our methods, we obtain an estimate of the ID(1) for the new assay, an important target for HIV vaccine candidates. In simulations, we compare the pseudo-likelihood estimates with regression calibration and a full joint likelihood approach.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society No claim to original US Federal works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21210769      PMCID: PMC3116946          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01536.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Repeated probit regression when covariates are measured with error.

Authors:  D A Follmann; S A Hunsberger; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A measurement-error model for binary and ordinal regression.

Authors:  T D Tosteson; L A Stefanski; D W Schafer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Interval estimation of the median lethal dose.

Authors:  D A Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env clones from acute and early subtype B infections for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Ming Li; Feng Gao; John R Mascola; Leonidas Stamatatos; Victoria R Polonis; Marguerite Koutsoukos; Gerald Voss; Paul Goepfert; Peter Gilbert; Kelli M Greene; Miroslawa Bilska; Denise L Kothe; Jesus F Salazar-Gonzalez; Xiping Wei; Julie M Decker; Beatrice H Hahn; David C Montefiori
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Determination of a statistically valid neutralization titer in plasma that confers protection against simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge following passive transfer of high-titered neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nishimura; Tatsuhiko Igarashi; Nancy Haigwood; Reza Sadjadpour; Ron J Plishka; Alicia Buckler-White; Riri Shibata; Malcolm A Martin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Neutralizing antibody titers conferring protection to macaques from a simian/human immunodeficiency virus challenge using the TZM-bl assay.

Authors:  Ronald Willey; Martha C Nason; Yoshiaki Nishimura; Dean A Follmann; Malcolm A Martin
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.205

8.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 superinfection occurs despite relatively robust neutralizing antibody responses.

Authors:  Catherine A Blish; Ozge C Dogan; Nina R Derby; Minh-An Nguyen; Bhavna Chohan; Barbra A Richardson; Julie Overbaugh
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients.

Authors:  Joseph Beyene; Rahim Moineddin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.