Literature DB >> 2121002

Multicenter study of gadopentetate dimeglumine as an MR contrast agent: evaluation in patients with spinal tumors.

G Sze1, G K Stimac, C Bartlett, W P Dillon, V M Haughton, W Orrison, F Kashanian, H Goldstein.   

Abstract

In an open-label, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg) administered IV as an MR imaging contrast agent were evaluated in 113 patients with symptoms of spinal tumors. The examinations were performed with a variety of imagers at different field strengths. Scans with short and long TRs were obtained in all patients before and after IV administration of the contrast medium. Contrast enhancement was seen in 77% of patients. No enhancement was seen in 23%, but this absence was useful diagnostic information in all cases. In 66% of the cases, additional information regarding location, size, configuration, and/or characterization of the lesion was obtained from postcontrast scans. The investigators made a change from referral diagnosis to postinjection diagnosis in 30% of the cases. Postinjection images provided additional information in 96% (43/45) of intradural extramedullary and intramedullary tumors; it also provided additional information in 20 (53%) of 38 cases of extradural tumor. Gadopentetate dimeglumine demonstrated a high level of safety and tolerance, as evidenced by the lack of clinically significant trends toward abnormal changes from baseline evaluations for physical and neurologic examinations, vital signs, and hematologic and blood chemistry parameters and by the low prevalence and mild nature of adverse reactions. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was found to be efficacious in the evaluation of suspected spinal tumors. High levels of safety and tolerance were demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2121002      PMCID: PMC8334102     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  7 in total

1.  Pseudoenhancement of intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Y Araki; M Ootani; T Furukawa; T Yamamoto; I Tsukaguchi; M Mitomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Increases in the number of brain metastases detected at frame-fixed, thin-slice MRI for gamma knife surgery planning.

Authors:  Aiko Nagai; Yuta Shibamoto; Yoshimasa Mori; Chisa Hashizume; Masahiro Hagiwara; Tatsuya Kobayashi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Non-enhancing pilocytic astrocytoma of the spinal cord.

Authors:  David B Larson; Gary L Hedlund
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  G M Lowe
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Nonenhancing intramedullary astrocytomas and other MR imaging features: a retrospective study and systematic review.

Authors:  H S Seo; J-h Kim; D H Lee; Y H Lee; S-i Suh; S Y Kim; D G Na
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media.

Authors:  M F Bellin; M Vasile; S Morel-Precetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A Nonenhancing World Health Organization Grade II Intramedullary Spinal Ependymoma in the Conus: Case Illustration and Review of Imaging Characteristics.

Authors:  Andrew A Fanous; Gregory F Jost; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.