| Literature DB >> 21209855 |
Simon C Drew1, Colin L Masters, Kevin J Barnham.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The amyloid-β (Aβ)Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21209855 PMCID: PMC3012727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Aβx–16 peptide sequences employed in this study, with labelled residues given in boldface.
| Aβ1–16 | DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQK-OH |
| Aβ3–16 | EFRHDSGYEVHHQK-OH |
| Aβ3[pE]–16 | [pE]FRHDSGYEVHHQK-OH |
| Aβ1[isoAsp]–16(13C(1)-isoAsp1) |
|
| Aβ1–16(A2V,15N-Val2) | D |
| Aβ1–16(A2V,13C(1)-Val2) | D |
C(1)-Asp/isoAsp = NH2CH(CH2COOH)1 COOH.
N-Val = H2CH(CHCH3CH3)COOH.
C(1)-Val = NH2CH(CHCH3CH3)OOH.
Figure 1X-band (9.43 GHz) CW-EPR spectra of Cu2+/Aβ1–16, Cu2+/Aβ1–16(A2V), Cu2+/Aβ1[isoAsp]–16, Cu2+/Aβ3–16 and Cu2+/Aβ3[pE]–16 (0.9 equiv 65CuCl2).
For comparative purposes, dashed vertical lines identify the position of the resolved A ||(65Cu) resonances corresponding to component Ia/b and component II of Cu2+/Aβ1–16. Spectra of Cu2+/Aβ1[isoAsp]–16 and Cu2+/Aβ1–16(A2V) correspond to the 13C(1)-isoAsp1 and 13C(1)-Val2 labelled analogues, respectively.
SH parameters corresponding to the different coordination modes of various Cu2+/Aβx–16 complexes.
| Peptide |
|
|
|
|
| Ref |
|
| ||||||
| {NH2 D1, COO− D1, NIm, NIm} | 2.255±0.002 | 2.054±0.002 | 185±2 | 14.3±0.5 | 10.6±0.5 | This work |
| 13.1±0.5 | ||||||
| 14.7±0.5 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| {NH2 D1, COA2,V2, NIm H6, NIm H13/H14} | 2.272±0.005 | 2.056±0.005 | 171±3 | 14.5±0.5 | 11.3±0.5 (14Na D1) |
|
| (“component Ia/b”) | 13.0±0.5 (14NIm H6) | this work | ||||
| 14.0±0.5 (14NIm H13/H14) | ||||||
| {COA2, NIm H6, NIm H13, NIm H14} | 2.227±0.003 | 2.043±0.003 | 157±3 | 21.0±1.0 | 15.0±1.0 (14NIm H6) |
|
| (“component II”) | 12.5±1.0 (14NIm H13) | this work | ||||
| 12.5±1.0 (14NIm H14) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| {3N1O} “low pH” | 2.261±0.002 | 2.053±0.002 | 183±1 | 16.8±0.5 | 12.1±0.5 (14N1) | This work |
| 14.3±0.5 (14N2) | ||||||
| 15.9±0.5 (14N3) | ||||||
| {4N} “high pH” | 2.194±0.002 | 2.034±0.002 | 193±1 | 16.3±0.5 | 10.6±0.5 (14N1) | This work |
| 13.2±0.5 (14N2) | ||||||
| 14.2±0.5 (14N3) | ||||||
| 16.1±0.5 (14N4) | ||||||
| Aβ4–16 | ||||||
| {4N} | 2.178±0.001 | 2.049 | 209±1 | n.d. | n.d. |
|
All hyperfine parameters are expressed in units of A [10−4cm−1] = A [MHz]/2.9979 = A i [G] × 104(g e/hc), where i = || or ⊥, h is Plank's constant, c = 2.9979 ×1010cm.s−1 and β e = 9.274×10−28 J.G−1.
To aid comparison with other work in which natural abundance copper (69% 63Cu, 31% 65Cu) has been used, hyperfine couplings have been converted from 65Cu to those expected for 63Cu using the scaling factor |g n(65Cu)/g n(63Cu)| = 1.07. Uncertainties in parameters represent the estimated range.
SH parameters from simulation of wt peptide [15].
{NH2 D1, Nam A2, COA2, NIm H6} coordination has also been proposed [17].
Parameters based upon simulation of Cu2+/Aβ3[pE]–16 at pH 6.9.
Parameters based upon simulation of Cu2+/Aβ3–16 at pH 8.5.
n.d. = not determined.
Figure 2Two-dimensional representation of the 5-membered chelate formed by (a) Cu2+/Aβ1[isoAsp]–16 and (b) Cu2+/Aβ1–16 (R = CH3) and Cu2+/Aβ1–16(A2V) (R = CH2(CH3)3), with one possible H-bonding interaction shown.
The coordination in (b) only predominates below pH 8, whereas the stable chelate in (a) remains the sole coordination mode (Figure 1).
Figure 3Simulation of the X-band CW-EPR spectrum of Cu2+/Aβ1[isoAsp]–16 at pH 6.9.
(a) First derivative. (b) Second derivative, expanded around g ⊥ region. Simulation parameters appear in Table 2. Experimental spectra correspond to the 13C(1)-isoAsp1 labelled analogue.
Figure 4X-band (9.70 GHz) HYSCORE spectra (τ = 144 ns) of Cu2+/Aβ16 analogues (0.9 equiv 65CuCl2), obtained at 3085 G.
For clarity, the cross-peaks between Nτ single-quantum and double-quantum transitions are not marked by dashed boxes. Grey dashed boxes highlight loss of cross-peaks.
Figure 5X-band (9.70 GHz) HYSCORE spectra (τ = 144 ns) of Cu2+/Aβ16 analogues (0.9 equiv 65CuCl2), obtained at 3370 G (near g ⊥).
Figure 6Simulation of the X-band CW-EPR spectrum of Cu2+/Aβ3[pE]–16 at pH 6.9.
(a) First derivative. (b) Second derivative, expanded around g ⊥ region. Simulation parameters appear in Table 2.
Figure 7Simulation of the X-band CW-EPR spectrum of Cu2+/Aβ3–16 at pH 8.5.
(a) First derivative. (b) Second derivative, expanded around g ⊥ region. Simulation parameters appear in Table 2. Additional broadening is present in the experimental spectrum that may correspond to the onset additional 4N coordination mode(s) at higher pH or the presence of residual low pH coordination.
Figure 8Postulated mechanism of Cu2+-promoted amide hydrolysis leading to Aβ truncation at Glu3.
(a) Coordination of Ala2 (component II coordination mode) polarises the carbonyl carbon, allowing nucleophilic attack by OH−, leading to (b) the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate (TI), possibly via a Cu+ oxidation state (alternatively, the coordination may be Cu2+–O−–C–); (c) subsequent breakdown of the TI involving cleavage of the amide bond and protonation of the leaving amide. This latter step may involve the participation of a nearby amino acid side chain for proton transfer to the leaving amide nitrogen. Additional transient interactions with other cofactors in vivo could be required to promote formation, and importantly the breakdown, of the TI. Other biological nucleophiles may also be considered in step (a), such thiols (eg. glutathione, L-homocysteine) or a serine hydroxyl group. The geometry of the coordinating ligands is drawn schematically only.