Literature DB >> 2120944

Thermal effects of MR imaging: worst-case studies on sheep.

B J Barber1, D J Schaefer, C J Gordon, D C Zawieja, J Hecker.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to provide a worst-case estimate of thermal effects of MR imaging by subjecting anesthetized unshorn sheep to power deposition at specific absorption rates (SARs) well above approved standards for periods of time in excess of normal clinical imaging protocols. A control period with no RF power was followed by 20-105 min of RF power application. Afterward, there was a 20-min or longer recovery period with no RF power. Eight sheep were given whole-body RF exposure (1.5- to 4-W/kg SAR) while rectal and skin temperatures were monitored. Four sheep were subjected to 4-W/kg head scans for an average of 75 min while temperatures of the cornea, vitreous humor, head skin, jugular vein, and rectum were measured. In head scanning experiments, skin and eye temperatures increased about 1.5 degrees C. Jugular vein temperature rose a maximum of 0.4 degrees C after an average exposure of 75 min. In whole-body exposures, elevation of rectal temperature was correlated with energy input. Deep-body temperature rises in excess of 2.0 degrees C were attained for 4-W/kg whole-body exposure periods greater than 82 min. Animals exposed for 40 min to 4 W/kg in either body coil (three sheep) or head coil (two sheep) were recovered and observed to be in good health for 10 weeks; no cataracts were found. MR power deposition at SAR levels well above typical clinical imaging protocols caused body temperature to increase. For exposure periods in excess of standard clinical imaging protocols the temperature increase was insufficient to cause adverse thermal effects. Studies in healthy humans are needed to determine whether enhanced heat-loss effector mechanisms are likely to cause deep-body temperatures to plateau at an acceptable level, and to elucidate mechanisms that determine subcutaneous temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2120944     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.5.2120944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Radiofrequency heating at 9.4T: in vivo temperature measurement results in swine.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Robert Schlentz; William Gallaghar; Carl Snyder; Lance Delabarre; Surya Prakash; Paul Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Parallel transmission RF pulse design with strict temperature constraints.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz; Giuseppe Carluccio; Christopher Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  (19)F MRI for quantitative in vivo cell tracking.

Authors:  Mangala Srinivas; Arend Heerschap; Eric T Ahrens; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  In vivo radiofrequency heating in swine in a 3T (123.2-MHz) birdcage whole body coil.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Lynn Utecht; Jinfeng Tian; John Hughes; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Radiofrequency heating in porcine models with a "large" 32 cm internal diameter, 7 T (296 MHz) head coil.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Jeramy Kulesa; Jinfeng Tian; Gregor Adriany; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Radio frequency heating at 9.4T (400.2 MHz): in vivo thermoregulatory temperature response in swine.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Jeramy Kulesa; Lance DelaBarre; Paul Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.668

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.