Literature DB >> 21208945

The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.

Rick A Veasey1, Anita Arya, John Silberbauer, Vinoda Sharma, Guy W Lloyd, Nikhil R Patel, A Neil Sulke.   

Abstract

AIMS: In patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation for sinus node disease (SND) or atrioventricular (AV) block, right ventricular (RV) pacing has been demonstrated to increase the risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF). The effects of RV pacing in patients with paroxysmal AF are less well defined. Short- and medium-term studies have suggested no significant correlation between RV pacing and atrial fibrillation burden (AFB) measurement; we sought to assess for an effect in the long-term. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were randomized to receive either conventional dual chamber pacing (DDDR, n = 33), or dual chamber minimal ventricular pacing (MinVP, n = 33), for a period of at least 1 year. Patients were reviewed every 6 months and all pacemaker data were downloaded. The primary outcome measures were device-derived AFB and progression to persistent AF. The mean duration of study follow-up was 1.4 ± 0.6 years. Mean ventricular pacing was less in the MinVP cohort compared with the DDDR cohort (5.8 vs. 74.0%, P < 0.001). At follow-up, the device-derived AFB was significantly lower in the MinVP cohort when compared with the DDDR cohort (12.8 ± 15.3% vs. DDDR 47.6 ± 42.2%, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to onset of persistent AF showed significant reductions in the rates of persistent AF for MinVP pacing (9%) when compared with conventional DDDR pacing (42%), P = 0.004.
CONCLUSION: Right ventricular pacing induces increased AFB in patients with paroxysmal AF in the long term. Dual chamber MinVP algorithms result in reduced AFB and reduced disease progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208945     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  11 in total

1.  Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.

Authors:  A Bauer; J Vermeulen; L Toivonen; J Voitk; C Barr; P Peytchev
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 2.  Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.

Authors:  Shaojie Chen; Zhenglong Wang; Marcio Galindo Kiuchi; Bruno Rustum Andrea; Mitchell W Krucoff; Shaowen Liu; Helmut Pürerfellner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Heart Rhythm Society: expert consensus statements-part 1.

Authors:  Susie Sennhauser; Rishi Anand; Fred Kusumoto; Nora Goldschlager
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  The natural history of atrial fibrillation in patients with permanent pacemakers: is atrial fibrillation a progressive disease?

Authors:  R A Veasey; C Sugihara; K Sandhu; G Dhillon; N Freemantle; S S Furniss; A N Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Risk factors for bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tyler W Barrett; Robert L Abraham; Cathy A Jenkins; Stephan Russ; Alan B Storrow; Dawood Darbar
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.

Authors:  Philippe Mabo; Jean-Pierre Cebron; Aude Solnon; Aude Tassin; Laurence Graindorge; Daniel Gras
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Combining current of injury and P-wave sensing optimized right atrial active-fixation leads implantation.

Authors:  Meng-Rong Chen; Fei-Long Zhang; Wei-Wei Wang; Xue-Hai Chen; Jian-Hua Chen; Liang-Long Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

9.  Very Low Ventricular Pacing Rates Can Be Achieved Safely in a Heterogeneous Pacemaker Population and Provide Clinical Benefits: The CANadian Multi-Centre Randomised Study-Spontaneous AtrioVEntricular Conduction pReservation (CAN-SAVE R) Trial.

Authors:  Bernard Thibault; Anique Ducharme; Adrian Baranchuk; Marc Dubuc; Katia Dyrda; Peter G Guerra; Laurent Macle; Blandine Mondésert; Léna Rivard; Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Jason Andrade; Rémi Nitzsché; Paul Khairy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population.

Authors:  Martin Stockburger; Serge Boveda; Javier Moreno; Antoine Da Costa; Robert Hatala; Johannes Brachmann; Christian Butter; Javier Garcia Seara; Mara Rolando; Pascal Defaye
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.