Literature DB >> 21208264

Test-enhanced learning may be a gender-related phenomenon explained by changes in cortisol level.

Charles B Kromann1, Morten L Jensen, Charlotte Ringsted.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: testing increases memory of a topic studied more than additional study or training. The mechanisms by which this occurs are not clearly understood. Testing can be stressful and studies suggest that the stress hormone cortisol has modulating effects on memory, predominantly in men. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills testing induce a cortisol increase, whether the cortisol increase enhances retention of CPR skills, and how this relates to gender.
METHODS: we randomised a convenience sample of medical students attending a mandatory course to one intervention and one control group. Students received a 4-hour course on CPR skills. During the final half-hour of the intervention course, participants were tested in CPR scenarios, whereas the control group underwent additional training. We assessed learning outcomes 2 weeks later by rating student performance in a CPR scenario using a checklist and a single blinded assessor. We measured salivary cortisol pre-course, half an hour before the end of the course and post-course, and compared learning outcomes and cortisol responses between groups and genders.
RESULTS: in total, 146 of 202 (72%) students completed the study. We found a significant difference in learning outcome between the intervention and control groups for both genders (mean ± standard deviation, 5.0 ± 3.5; p = 0.006). We found a significant effect of increase in cortisol on learning outcome in men. The correlation between learning outcome and cortisol increase was medium to large for men (r = 0.38), but not for women (r = -0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills testing induces a rise in cortisol in men, which is related to the better retention of skills in men. Cortisol modulates test-enhanced learning in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208264     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Stressors on Clinical Skills Performance in Third-Year Medical Students.

Authors:  Pierre Pottier; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Thomas Dejoie; Jean-Marie Castillo; Anne-Gaelle Le Loupp; Bernard Planchon; Angélique Bonnaud; Vicki LeBlanc
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Ali; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Mindfulness practice reduces cortisol blunting during chemotherapy: A randomized controlled study of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  David S Black; Cheng Peng; Alix G Sleight; Nathalie Nguyen; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Jane C Figueiredo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Effectiveness of Test-Enhanced Learning (TEL) in lectures for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Aisha Ayyub; Usman Mahboob
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios.

Authors:  Sascha Ludwig; Nikolai Schuelper; Jamie Brown; Sven Anders; Tobias Raupach
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 8.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.