Literature DB >> 21207952

Thin film assembly of spider silk-like block copolymers.

Sreevidhya T Krishnaji1, Wenwen Huang, Olena Rabotyagova, Eugenia Kharlampieva, Ikjun Choi, Vladimir V Tsukruk, Rajesh Naik, Peggy Cebe, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

We report the self-assembly of monolayers of spider silk-like block copolymers. Langmuir isotherms were obtained for a series of bioengineered variants of the spider silks, and stable monolayers were generated. Langmuir-Blodgett films were prepared by transferring the monolayers onto silica substrates and were subsequently analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Static contact angle measurements were performed to characterize interactions across the interface (thin film, water, air), and molecular modeling was used to predict 3D conformation of spider silk-like block copolymers. The influence of molecular architecture and volume fraction of the proteins on the self-assembly process was assessed. At high surface pressure, spider silk-like block copolymers with minimal hydrophobic block (f(A) = 12%) formed oblate structures, whereas block copolymer with a 6-fold larger hydrophobic domain (f(A) = 46%) formed prolate structures. The varied morphologies obtained with increased hydrophobicity offer new options for biomaterials for coatings and related options. The design and use of bioengineered protein block copolymers assembled at air-water interfaces provides a promising approach to compare 2D microstructures and molecular architectures of these amphiphiles, leading to more rationale designs for a range of nanoengineered biomaterial needs as well as providing a basis of comparison to more traditional synthetic block copolymer systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21207952     DOI: 10.1021/la102638j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review of combined experimental and computational procedures for assessing biopolymer structure-process-property relationships.

Authors:  Greta Gronau; Sreevidhya T Krishnaji; Michelle E Kinahan; Tristan Giesa; Joyce Y Wong; David L Kaplan; Markus J Buehler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Silk-elastin-like protein biomaterials for the controlled delivery of therapeutics.

Authors:  Wenwen Huang; Alexandra Rollett; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Bioengineered chimeric spider silk-uranium binding proteins.

Authors:  Sreevidhya Tarakkad Krishnaji; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.979

4.  Heat Capacity of Spider Silk-like Block Copolymers.

Authors:  Wenwen Huang; Sreevidhya Krishnaji; Xiao Hu; David Kaplan; Peggy Cebe
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.985

Review 5.  Structure-function-property-design interplay in biopolymers: spider silk.

Authors:  Olena Tokareva; Matthew Jacobsen; Markus Buehler; Joyce Wong; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  Synergistic Integration of Experimental and Simulation Approaches for the de Novo Design of Silk-Based Materials.

Authors:  Wenwen Huang; Davoud Ebrahimi; Nina Dinjaski; Anna Tarakanova; Markus J Buehler; Joyce Y Wong; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 24.466

Review 7.  Silk fibroin-based nanoparticles for drug delivery.

Authors:  Zheng Zhao; Yi Li; Mao-Bin Xie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Mechanical and physical properties of recombinant spider silk films using organic and aqueous solvents.

Authors:  Chauncey L Tucker; Justin A Jones; Heidi N Bringhurst; Cameron G Copeland; J Bennett Addison; Warner S Weber; Qiushi Mou; Jeffery L Yarger; Randolph V Lewis
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 6.988

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.